vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and Unity Software Inc. (U). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($558.0M vs $503.1M, roughly 1.1× Unity Software Inc.). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs -17.9%, a 47.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Unity Software Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.1% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Kimco Realty's revenue compounded faster (5.6% CAGR vs 4.5%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

Unity Software Inc. is an American video game software development company based in San Francisco. It was founded in Denmark in 2004 as Over the Edge Entertainment and changed its name in 2007. Unity Technologies is best known for the development of Unity, a licensed game engine used to create video games and other applications.

KIM vs U — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KIM
KIM
1.1× larger
KIM
$558.0M
$503.1M
U
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
U
U
+6.1% gap
U
10.1%
4.0%
KIM
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
47.7% more per $
KIM
29.8%
-17.9%
U
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
KIM
KIM
Annualised
KIM
5.6%
4.5%
U

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
KIM
KIM
U
U
Revenue
$558.0M
$503.1M
Net Profit
$166.3M
$-90.0M
Gross Margin
74.3%
Operating Margin
37.2%
-21.2%
Net Margin
29.8%
-17.9%
Revenue YoY
4.0%
10.1%
Net Profit YoY
23.7%
26.7%
EPS (diluted)
$0.46
$-0.21

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
U
U
Q1 26
$558.0M
Q4 25
$542.5M
$503.1M
Q3 25
$535.9M
$470.6M
Q2 25
$525.2M
$440.9M
Q1 25
$536.6M
$435.0M
Q4 24
$525.4M
$457.1M
Q3 24
$507.6M
$446.5M
Q2 24
$500.2M
$449.3M
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
U
U
Q1 26
$166.3M
Q4 25
$151.2M
$-90.0M
Q3 25
$137.8M
$-126.4M
Q2 25
$163.0M
$-108.8M
Q1 25
$132.8M
$-77.6M
Q4 24
$166.0M
$-122.7M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$-124.7M
Q2 24
$119.7M
$-125.6M
Gross Margin
KIM
KIM
U
U
Q1 26
Q4 25
74.3%
Q3 25
74.4%
Q2 25
74.1%
Q1 25
73.8%
Q4 24
74.7%
Q3 24
74.9%
Q2 24
75.8%
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
U
U
Q1 26
37.2%
Q4 25
36.4%
-21.2%
Q3 25
34.9%
-26.7%
Q2 25
39.2%
-26.9%
Q1 25
33.6%
-29.4%
Q4 24
31.7%
-27.1%
Q3 24
33.7%
-28.5%
Q2 24
32.1%
-28.8%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
U
U
Q1 26
29.8%
Q4 25
27.9%
-17.9%
Q3 25
25.7%
-26.9%
Q2 25
31.0%
-24.7%
Q1 25
24.8%
-17.8%
Q4 24
31.6%
-26.8%
Q3 24
26.8%
-27.9%
Q2 24
23.9%
-28.0%
EPS (diluted)
KIM
KIM
U
U
Q1 26
$0.46
Q4 25
$-0.21
Q3 25
$-0.30
Q2 25
$-0.26
Q1 25
$-0.19
Q4 24
$-0.30
Q3 24
$-0.31
Q2 24
$-0.32

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
U
U
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$2.1B
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
$3.2B
Total Assets
$19.6B
$6.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
U
U
Q1 26
Q4 25
$211.6M
$2.1B
Q3 25
$159.3M
$1.9B
Q2 25
$226.6M
$1.7B
Q1 25
$131.3M
$1.5B
Q4 24
$688.6M
$1.5B
Q3 24
$789.0M
$1.4B
Q2 24
$126.4M
$1.3B
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
U
U
Q1 26
Q4 25
$7.7B
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$8.0B
Q3 24
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
U
U
Q1 26
$10.4B
Q4 25
$10.4B
$3.2B
Q3 25
$10.5B
$3.2B
Q2 25
$10.5B
$3.2B
Q1 25
$10.6B
$3.2B
Q4 24
$10.7B
$3.2B
Q3 24
$10.5B
$3.2B
Q2 24
$10.6B
$3.2B
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
U
U
Q1 26
$19.6B
Q4 25
$19.7B
$6.8B
Q3 25
$19.9B
$6.8B
Q2 25
$19.8B
$6.7B
Q1 25
$19.7B
$6.6B
Q4 24
$20.3B
$6.7B
Q3 24
$20.1B
$6.7B
Q2 24
$19.5B
$6.7B
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
U
U
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.74×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.75×
Q3 24
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KIM
KIM
U
U
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$121.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$118.7M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
23.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.5%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$403.9M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
U
U
Q1 26
Q4 25
$258.4M
$121.4M
Q3 25
$332.4M
$155.4M
Q2 25
$305.4M
$133.1M
Q1 25
$223.8M
$13.0M
Q4 24
$239.5M
$112.2M
Q3 24
$295.9M
$122.4M
Q2 24
$294.1M
$88.4M
Free Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
U
U
Q1 26
Q4 25
$118.7M
Q3 25
$151.3M
Q2 25
$126.7M
Q1 25
$205.4M
$7.3M
Q4 24
$105.8M
Q3 24
$115.2M
Q2 24
$79.6M
FCF Margin
KIM
KIM
U
U
Q1 26
Q4 25
23.6%
Q3 25
32.1%
Q2 25
28.7%
Q1 25
38.3%
1.7%
Q4 24
23.1%
Q3 24
25.8%
Q2 24
17.7%
Capex Intensity
KIM
KIM
U
U
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.0%
0.5%
Q3 25
0.0%
0.9%
Q2 25
0.0%
1.5%
Q1 25
3.4%
1.3%
Q4 24
1.4%
Q3 24
1.6%
Q2 24
2.0%
Cash Conversion
KIM
KIM
U
U
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.71×
Q3 25
2.41×
Q2 25
1.87×
Q1 25
1.69×
Q4 24
1.44×
Q3 24
2.18×
Q2 24
2.46×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KIM
KIM

Revenues from rental properties, net$552.8M99%
Management and other fee income$5.2M1%

U
U

Grow Solutions$338.2M67%
Create Solutions$164.9M33%

Related Comparisons