vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and UNIVERSAL INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC. (UVE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($542.5M vs $393.6M, roughly 1.4× UNIVERSAL INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 27.9% vs 13.8%, a 14.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kimco Realty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.2% vs -0.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Kimco Realty's revenue compounded faster (3.8% CAGR vs 1.7%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

New York Life Insurance Company (NYLIC), most commonly known as New York Life, is the second-largest life insurance company and the largest mutual life insurance company in the United States, and is ranked #69 on the 2025 Fortune 500 list of the largest U.S. corporations by total revenue. In 2025, NYLIC achieved the best possible ratings by the four independent rating companies. Other New York Life affiliates provide an array of securities products and services, as well as institutional and r...

KIM vs UVE — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KIM
KIM
1.4× larger
KIM
$542.5M
$393.6M
UVE
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
KIM
KIM
+3.6% gap
KIM
3.2%
-0.3%
UVE
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
14.1% more per $
KIM
27.9%
13.8%
UVE
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
KIM
KIM
Annualised
KIM
3.8%
1.7%
UVE

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
KIM
KIM
UVE
UVE
Revenue
$542.5M
$393.6M
Net Profit
$151.2M
$54.3M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
36.4%
Net Margin
27.9%
13.8%
Revenue YoY
3.2%
-0.3%
Net Profit YoY
-9.0%
31.0%
EPS (diluted)
$1.88

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
UVE
UVE
Q1 26
$393.6M
Q4 25
$542.5M
$407.9M
Q3 25
$535.9M
$401.0M
Q2 25
$525.2M
$400.1M
Q1 25
$536.6M
$394.9M
Q4 24
$525.4M
$384.8M
Q3 24
$507.6M
$387.6M
Q2 24
$500.2M
$380.2M
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
UVE
UVE
Q1 26
$54.3M
Q4 25
$151.2M
$66.6M
Q3 25
$137.8M
$39.8M
Q2 25
$163.0M
$35.1M
Q1 25
$132.8M
$41.4M
Q4 24
$166.0M
$6.0M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$-16.2M
Q2 24
$119.7M
$35.4M
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
UVE
UVE
Q1 26
Q4 25
36.4%
21.7%
Q3 25
34.9%
13.2%
Q2 25
39.2%
11.6%
Q1 25
33.6%
14.0%
Q4 24
31.7%
1.9%
Q3 24
33.7%
-4.7%
Q2 24
32.1%
12.6%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
UVE
UVE
Q1 26
13.8%
Q4 25
27.9%
16.3%
Q3 25
25.7%
9.9%
Q2 25
31.0%
8.8%
Q1 25
24.8%
10.5%
Q4 24
31.6%
1.6%
Q3 24
26.8%
-4.2%
Q2 24
23.9%
9.3%
EPS (diluted)
KIM
KIM
UVE
UVE
Q1 26
$1.88
Q4 25
$2.29
Q3 25
$1.38
Q2 25
$1.21
Q1 25
$1.44
Q4 24
$0.23
Q3 24
$-0.57
Q2 24
$1.21

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
UVE
UVE
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$211.6M
$595.8M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$7.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
$584.7M
Total Assets
$19.7B
$2.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.74×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
UVE
UVE
Q1 26
$595.8M
Q4 25
$211.6M
$408.9M
Q3 25
$159.3M
$405.1M
Q2 25
$226.6M
$367.1M
Q1 25
$131.3M
$398.2M
Q4 24
$688.6M
$259.4M
Q3 24
$789.0M
$333.7M
Q2 24
$126.4M
$283.3M
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
UVE
UVE
Q1 26
Q4 25
$7.7B
$100.5M
Q3 25
$100.7M
Q2 25
$100.9M
Q1 25
$101.1M
Q4 24
$8.0B
$101.2M
Q3 24
$101.4M
Q2 24
$101.6M
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
UVE
UVE
Q1 26
$584.7M
Q4 25
$10.4B
$551.0M
Q3 25
$10.5B
$495.0M
Q2 25
$10.5B
$457.8M
Q1 25
$10.6B
$422.4M
Q4 24
$10.7B
$373.3M
Q3 24
$10.5B
$400.2M
Q2 24
$10.6B
$393.2M
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
UVE
UVE
Q1 26
$2.8B
Q4 25
$19.7B
$2.8B
Q3 25
$19.9B
$3.1B
Q2 25
$19.8B
$3.3B
Q1 25
$19.7B
$2.7B
Q4 24
$20.3B
$2.8B
Q3 24
$20.1B
$2.7B
Q2 24
$19.5B
$2.7B
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
UVE
UVE
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.74×
0.18×
Q3 25
0.20×
Q2 25
0.22×
Q1 25
0.24×
Q4 24
0.75×
0.27×
Q3 24
0.25×
Q2 24
0.26×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KIM
KIM
UVE
UVE
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$258.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.71×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
UVE
UVE
Q1 26
Q4 25
$258.4M
$381.5M
Q3 25
$332.4M
$62.4M
Q2 25
$305.4M
$106.2M
Q1 25
$223.8M
$186.8M
Q4 24
$239.5M
$137.4M
Q3 24
$295.9M
$82.6M
Q2 24
$294.1M
$73.2M
Free Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
UVE
UVE
Q1 26
Q4 25
$377.1M
Q3 25
$61.3M
Q2 25
$105.2M
Q1 25
$205.4M
$185.5M
Q4 24
$130.0M
Q3 24
$81.0M
Q2 24
$71.6M
FCF Margin
KIM
KIM
UVE
UVE
Q1 26
Q4 25
92.4%
Q3 25
15.3%
Q2 25
26.3%
Q1 25
38.3%
47.0%
Q4 24
33.8%
Q3 24
20.9%
Q2 24
18.8%
Capex Intensity
KIM
KIM
UVE
UVE
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.0%
1.1%
Q3 25
0.0%
0.3%
Q2 25
0.0%
0.2%
Q1 25
3.4%
0.3%
Q4 24
1.9%
Q3 24
0.4%
Q2 24
0.4%
Cash Conversion
KIM
KIM
UVE
UVE
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.71×
5.73×
Q3 25
2.41×
1.57×
Q2 25
1.87×
3.03×
Q1 25
1.69×
4.51×
Q4 24
1.44×
22.82×
Q3 24
2.18×
Q2 24
2.46×
2.07×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons