vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and Worthington Steel, Inc. (WS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Worthington Steel, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($871.9M vs $542.5M, roughly 1.6× Kimco Realty). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 27.9% vs 2.2%, a 25.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Worthington Steel, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.0% vs 3.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Worthington Steel, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (3.9% CAGR vs 3.8%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

Worthington Enterprises, Inc. is an American industrial manufacturing company headquartered in Columbus, Ohio. The company is composed of two business segments, consumer products and building products. Within these segments, the company designs and manufactures pressure vessels such as propane, oxygen and helium tanks, refrigerant and industrial cylinders, camping and residential use cylinders, water system tanks for storage, treatment, heating, expansion and flow control, as well as a variet...

KIM vs WS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
WS
WS
1.6× larger
WS
$871.9M
$542.5M
KIM
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
WS
WS
+14.7% gap
WS
18.0%
3.2%
KIM
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
25.7% more per $
KIM
27.9%
2.2%
WS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
WS
WS
Annualised
WS
3.9%
3.8%
KIM

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026

Metric
KIM
KIM
WS
WS
Revenue
$542.5M
$871.9M
Net Profit
$151.2M
$18.8M
Gross Margin
10.7%
Operating Margin
36.4%
2.5%
Net Margin
27.9%
2.2%
Revenue YoY
3.2%
18.0%
Net Profit YoY
-9.0%
46.9%
EPS (diluted)
$0.37

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
WS
WS
Q4 25
$542.5M
$871.9M
Q3 25
$535.9M
$872.9M
Q2 25
$525.2M
$832.9M
Q1 25
$536.6M
$687.4M
Q4 24
$525.4M
$739.0M
Q3 24
$507.6M
$834.0M
Q2 24
$500.2M
Q1 24
$503.8M
$805.8M
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
WS
WS
Q4 25
$151.2M
$18.8M
Q3 25
$137.8M
$36.8M
Q2 25
$163.0M
$55.7M
Q1 25
$132.8M
$13.8M
Q4 24
$166.0M
$12.8M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$28.4M
Q2 24
$119.7M
Q1 24
$-11.0M
$49.0M
Gross Margin
KIM
KIM
WS
WS
Q4 25
10.7%
Q3 25
13.2%
Q2 25
15.2%
Q1 25
11.8%
Q4 24
10.8%
Q3 24
12.0%
Q2 24
Q1 24
14.9%
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
WS
WS
Q4 25
36.4%
2.5%
Q3 25
34.9%
5.5%
Q2 25
39.2%
8.0%
Q1 25
33.6%
2.7%
Q4 24
31.7%
2.6%
Q3 24
33.7%
5.2%
Q2 24
32.1%
Q1 24
25.9%
8.2%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
WS
WS
Q4 25
27.9%
2.2%
Q3 25
25.7%
4.2%
Q2 25
31.0%
6.7%
Q1 25
24.8%
2.0%
Q4 24
31.6%
1.7%
Q3 24
26.8%
3.4%
Q2 24
23.9%
Q1 24
-2.2%
6.1%
EPS (diluted)
KIM
KIM
WS
WS
Q4 25
$0.37
Q3 25
$0.72
Q2 25
$1.11
Q1 25
$0.27
Q4 24
$0.25
Q3 24
$0.56
Q2 24
Q1 24
$0.98

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
WS
WS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$211.6M
$89.8M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$7.7B
$72.1M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
$1.1B
Total Assets
$19.7B
$2.1B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.74×
0.06×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
WS
WS
Q4 25
$211.6M
$89.8M
Q3 25
$159.3M
$78.3M
Q2 25
$226.6M
$38.0M
Q1 25
$131.3M
$63.3M
Q4 24
$688.6M
$52.0M
Q3 24
$789.0M
$36.0M
Q2 24
$126.4M
Q1 24
$133.4M
$60.8M
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
WS
WS
Q4 25
$7.7B
$72.1M
Q3 25
$73.4M
Q2 25
$151.5M
Q1 25
Q4 24
$8.0B
$115.0M
Q3 24
$122.2M
Q2 24
Q1 24
$147.2M
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
WS
WS
Q4 25
$10.4B
$1.1B
Q3 25
$10.5B
$1.1B
Q2 25
$10.5B
$1.1B
Q1 25
$10.6B
$1.0B
Q4 24
$10.7B
$1.0B
Q3 24
$10.5B
$1.0B
Q2 24
$10.6B
Q1 24
$10.6B
$937.6M
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
WS
WS
Q4 25
$19.7B
$2.1B
Q3 25
$19.9B
$2.2B
Q2 25
$19.8B
$2.0B
Q1 25
$19.7B
$1.8B
Q4 24
$20.3B
$1.7B
Q3 24
$20.1B
$1.8B
Q2 24
$19.5B
Q1 24
$19.5B
$1.8B
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
WS
WS
Q4 25
0.74×
0.06×
Q3 25
0.07×
Q2 25
0.14×
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.75×
0.11×
Q3 24
0.12×
Q2 24
Q1 24
0.16×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KIM
KIM
WS
WS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$258.4M
$99.3M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$74.6M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
8.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.0%
2.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.71×
5.28×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$72.5M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
WS
WS
Q4 25
$258.4M
$99.3M
Q3 25
$332.4M
$-6.3M
Q2 25
$305.4M
$53.9M
Q1 25
$223.8M
$53.8M
Q4 24
$239.5M
$68.0M
Q3 24
$295.9M
$54.6M
Q2 24
$294.1M
Q1 24
$176.1M
$44.7M
Free Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
WS
WS
Q4 25
$74.6M
Q3 25
$-35.7M
Q2 25
$8.4M
Q1 25
$205.4M
$25.2M
Q4 24
$33.2M
Q3 24
$33.1M
Q2 24
Q1 24
$22.3M
FCF Margin
KIM
KIM
WS
WS
Q4 25
8.6%
Q3 25
-4.1%
Q2 25
1.0%
Q1 25
38.3%
3.7%
Q4 24
4.5%
Q3 24
4.0%
Q2 24
Q1 24
2.8%
Capex Intensity
KIM
KIM
WS
WS
Q4 25
0.0%
2.8%
Q3 25
0.0%
3.4%
Q2 25
0.0%
5.5%
Q1 25
3.4%
4.2%
Q4 24
4.7%
Q3 24
2.6%
Q2 24
Q1 24
2.8%
Cash Conversion
KIM
KIM
WS
WS
Q4 25
1.71×
5.28×
Q3 25
2.41×
-0.17×
Q2 25
1.87×
0.97×
Q1 25
1.69×
3.90×
Q4 24
1.44×
5.31×
Q3 24
2.18×
1.92×
Q2 24
2.46×
Q1 24
0.91×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KIM
KIM

Segment breakdown not available.

WS
WS

Direct$844.1M97%
Toll$27.8M3%

Related Comparisons