vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and OLYMPIC STEEL INC (ZEUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($542.5M vs $490.7M, roughly 1.1× OLYMPIC STEEL INC). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 27.9% vs 0.4%, a 27.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OLYMPIC STEEL INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.4% vs 3.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Kimco Realty's revenue compounded faster (3.8% CAGR vs 0.1%).
Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.
Olympic Steel, Inc. is a metals service center based in Cleveland, Ohio. The company processes and distributes carbon, coated and stainless flat-rolled sheet, coil and plate steel, aluminium alloy, tin plate, and metal-intensive branded products primarily in the United States. Metals processing and value added services include tempering, stretch leveling, cutting-to-length, slitting, edging, shearing, blanking, burning, forming, shot blasting, laser punching, plate rolling, fabricating, machi...
KIM vs ZEUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $542.5M | $490.7M |
| Net Profit | $151.2M | $2.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 36.4% | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | 27.9% | 0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.2% | 4.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.0% | -21.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $542.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $535.9M | $490.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $525.2M | $496.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.6M | $492.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $525.4M | $418.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $507.6M | $470.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $500.2M | $526.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $503.8M | $526.6M |
| Q4 25 | $151.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $137.8M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $163.0M | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.8M | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $166.0M | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.0M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.7M | $7.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.0M | $8.7M |
| Q4 25 | 36.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.6% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.7% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.1% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.9% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | 27.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.6% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.2% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.66 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $211.6M | $7.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $7.7B | $240.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.4B | $579.1M |
| Total Assets | $19.7B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.74× | 0.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $211.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $159.3M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $226.6M | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $131.3M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $688.6M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $789.0M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.4M | $9.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $133.4M | $10.3M |
| Q4 25 | $7.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $240.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $233.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $235.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.0B | $272.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $197.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $209.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $196.8M |
| Q4 25 | $10.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5B | $579.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5B | $578.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.6B | $574.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.7B | $573.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.5B | $570.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.6B | $569.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.6B | $563.0M |
| Q4 25 | $19.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.5B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.5B | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.75× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $258.4M | $-5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-12.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -2.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.71× | -2.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $41.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $258.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $332.4M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $305.4M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $223.8M | $49.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $239.5M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $295.9M | $24.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $294.1M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $176.1M | $-2.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $205.4M | $40.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-11.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-7.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.3% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.71× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.41× | -2.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.87× | 2.96× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.69× | 19.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.44× | 3.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | 9.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.46× | -0.38× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.30× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KIM
Segment breakdown not available.
ZEUS
| Carbon Flat Products | $268.2M | 55% |
| Specialty Metals Flat Products | $140.9M | 29% |
| Tubular And Pipe Products | $81.6M | 17% |
