vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and Zscaler, Inc. (ZS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Zscaler, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($788.1M vs $558.0M, roughly 1.4× Kimco Realty). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs -1.5%, a 31.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Zscaler, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.5% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Zscaler, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (22.5% CAGR vs 5.6%).
Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.
Zscaler, Inc. is an American cloud security company based in San Jose, California. The company offers cloud-based services to protect enterprise networks and data.
KIM vs ZS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $558.0M | $788.1M |
| Net Profit | $166.3M | $-11.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 76.6% |
| Operating Margin | 37.2% | -4.6% |
| Net Margin | 29.8% | -1.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.0% | 25.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 23.7% | 3.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.46 | $-0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $558.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $542.5M | $788.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $535.9M | $719.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $525.2M | $678.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.6M | $647.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $525.4M | $628.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $507.6M | $592.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $500.2M | $553.2M |
| Q1 26 | $166.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $151.2M | $-11.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $137.8M | $-17.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $163.0M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.8M | $-7.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $166.0M | $-12.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.0M | $-14.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.7M | $19.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 76.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 76.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 77.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 77.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 77.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 78.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 78.6% |
| Q1 26 | 37.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 36.4% | -4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.9% | -4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.2% | -3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.6% | -6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.7% | -4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.7% | -4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.1% | -0.5% |
| Q1 26 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.9% | -1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.7% | -2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.0% | -0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | -1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.6% | -1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.8% | -2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | 3.5% |
| Q1 26 | $0.46 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.4B | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $19.6B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $211.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $159.3M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $226.6M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $131.3M | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $688.6M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $789.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.4M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $10.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.6B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $19.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.7B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.9B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.8B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.7B | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.3B | $4.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.5B | $4.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.75× | 0.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.04× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $448.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $431.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 54.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $924.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $258.4M | $448.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $332.4M | $250.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $305.4M | $211.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $223.8M | $179.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $239.5M | $331.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $295.9M | $203.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $294.1M | $173.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $431.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $190.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $138.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $205.4M | $164.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $314.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $154.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $137.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 54.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.3% | 25.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 50.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 26.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 24.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.71× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.41× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.69× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.46× | 9.07× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KIM
| Revenues from rental properties, net | $552.8M | 99% |
| Management and other fee income | $5.2M | 1% |
ZS
Segment breakdown not available.
