vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Nauticus Robotics, Inc. (KITT) and Lucid Diagnostics Inc. (LUCD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Lucid Diagnostics Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2M vs $1.1M, roughly 1.1× Nauticus Robotics, Inc.). Lucid Diagnostics Inc. runs the higher net margin — -858.5% vs -1812.8%, a 954.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Nauticus Robotics, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (124.4% vs 3.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Lucid Diagnostics Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (7.9% CAGR vs -18.6%).
Nauticus Robotics, Inc. develops and manufactures autonomous underwater robots, intelligent marine operation systems, and provides tailored robotic services for clients across offshore energy, maritime defense, and ocean scientific research sectors, with core markets covering North America and global coastal operation regions.
Lucid Diagnostics Inc. is a commercial-stage medical diagnostics firm focused on non-invasive screening tests for upper gastrointestinal diseases, including early detection of esophageal cancer and pre-cancerous lesions. It mainly serves healthcare providers and clinical partners across the United States, targeting at-risk patient populations.
KITT vs LUCD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1M | $1.2M |
| Net Profit | $-19.2M | $-10.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -531.0% | -971.0% |
| Net Margin | -1812.8% | -858.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 124.4% | 3.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 77.3% | 16.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-7.31 | $-0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $828.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $471.2K | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $501.7K | $976.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $464.4K | $1.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-19.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.6M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.5M | $-4.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-26.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-84.5M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-12.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-72.8M | $-10.6M |
| Q4 25 | -531.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -297.3% | -971.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -307.0% | -978.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1508.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1312.1% | -1033.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -997.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1198.4% | -1146.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1195.1% | -1078.1% |
| Q4 25 | -1812.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -335.9% | -858.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -359.1% | -381.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3249.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17940.7% | -964.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1055.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 905.1% | -1127.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -15686.1% | -1060.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-7.31 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.60 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.26 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.52 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-267.45 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.25 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.12 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-58.75 | $-0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.0M | $47.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $21.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.0M | $25.8M |
| Total Assets | $42.6M | $53.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.06× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5M | $47.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7M | $31.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $25.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2M | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.1M | $24.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.2M | $24.8M |
| Q4 25 | $21.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $109.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $118.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.1M | $25.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.7M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-5.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-20.4M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-91.5M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-112.8M | $11.9M |
| Q4 25 | $42.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.8M | $53.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.9M | $38.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $32.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.7M | $30.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.2M | $34.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.4M | $32.0M |
| Q4 25 | 3.06× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.1M | $-10.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-5.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -470.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 86.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-21.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-4.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.4M | $-10.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-12.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.2M | $-9.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-10.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.4M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.7M | $-12.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-5.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | -470.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -249.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -354.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -903.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1678.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1504.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 86.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 69.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
