vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Nauticus Robotics, Inc. (KITT) and ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Nauticus Robotics, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1M vs $1.0M, roughly 1.0× ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.). ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -131.6% vs -1812.8%, a 1681.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Nauticus Robotics, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (124.4% vs 36.6%). ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-1.7M vs $-5.0M).

Nauticus Robotics, Inc. develops and manufactures autonomous underwater robots, intelligent marine operation systems, and provides tailored robotic services for clients across offshore energy, maritime defense, and ocean scientific research sectors, with core markets covering North America and global coastal operation regions.

ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. develops and supplies eco-friendly construction materials, environmental remediation services, and solid waste treatment solutions. Its core offerings include recycled construction aggregates, soil improvement products, and ecological restoration systems, primarily serving infrastructure, real estate, and environmental conservation sectors across the Chinese market.

KITT vs RETO — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KITT
KITT
1.0× larger
KITT
$1.1M
$1.0M
RETO
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
KITT
KITT
+87.8% gap
KITT
124.4%
36.6%
RETO
Higher net margin
RETO
RETO
1681.2% more per $
RETO
-131.6%
-1812.8%
KITT
More free cash flow
RETO
RETO
$3.3M more FCF
RETO
$-1.7M
$-5.0M
KITT

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025

Metric
KITT
KITT
RETO
RETO
Revenue
$1.1M
$1.0M
Net Profit
$-19.2M
$-1.4M
Gross Margin
17.7%
Operating Margin
-531.0%
-133.0%
Net Margin
-1812.8%
-131.6%
Revenue YoY
124.4%
36.6%
Net Profit YoY
77.3%
-103.5%
EPS (diluted)
$-7.31

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KITT
KITT
RETO
RETO
Q4 25
$1.1M
Q3 25
$2.0M
Q2 25
$2.1M
$1.0M
Q4 24
$471.2K
Q2 24
$501.7K
$768.4K
Q1 24
$464.4K
Q4 23
$1.1M
Q3 23
$1.6M
Net Profit
KITT
KITT
RETO
RETO
Q4 25
$-19.2M
Q3 25
$-6.6M
Q2 25
$-7.5M
$-1.4M
Q4 24
$-84.5M
Q2 24
$4.5M
$-678.5K
Q1 24
$-72.8M
Q4 23
$-39.5M
Q3 23
$-17.7M
Gross Margin
KITT
KITT
RETO
RETO
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
17.7%
Q4 24
Q2 24
43.3%
Q1 24
Q4 23
Q3 23
-66.4%
Operating Margin
KITT
KITT
RETO
RETO
Q4 25
-531.0%
Q3 25
-297.3%
Q2 25
-307.0%
-133.0%
Q4 24
-1312.1%
Q2 24
-1198.4%
-68.0%
Q1 24
-1195.1%
Q4 23
-3216.1%
Q3 23
-514.4%
Net Margin
KITT
KITT
RETO
RETO
Q4 25
-1812.8%
Q3 25
-335.9%
Q2 25
-359.1%
-131.6%
Q4 24
-17940.7%
Q2 24
905.1%
-88.3%
Q1 24
-15686.1%
Q4 23
-3717.8%
Q3 23
-1109.2%
EPS (diluted)
KITT
KITT
RETO
RETO
Q4 25
$-7.31
Q3 25
$-2.60
Q2 25
$-0.26
Q4 24
$-267.45
Q2 24
$-1.12
$-0.25
Q1 24
$-58.75
Q4 23
$-46.45
Q3 23
$-15.46

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KITT
KITT
RETO
RETO
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$7.0M
$2.5M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$21.5M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$7.0M
$30.4M
Total Assets
$42.6M
$41.4M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
3.06×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KITT
KITT
RETO
RETO
Q4 25
$7.0M
Q3 25
$5.5M
Q2 25
$2.7M
$2.5M
Q4 24
$1.2M
Q2 24
$8.1M
$1.6M
Q1 24
$6.2M
Q4 23
$753.4K
Q3 23
$6.8M
Total Debt
KITT
KITT
RETO
RETO
Q4 25
$21.5M
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q4 24
$28.9M
Q2 24
$109.5M
Q1 24
$118.6M
Q4 23
$31.6M
Q3 23
Stockholders' Equity
KITT
KITT
RETO
RETO
Q4 25
$7.0M
Q3 25
$-4.1M
Q2 25
$-5.7M
$30.4M
Q4 24
$-20.4M
Q2 24
$-91.5M
$13.3M
Q1 24
$-112.8M
Q4 23
$-41.8M
Q3 23
$-2.7M
Total Assets
KITT
KITT
RETO
RETO
Q4 25
$42.6M
Q3 25
$42.8M
Q2 25
$41.9M
$41.4M
Q4 24
$22.7M
Q2 24
$31.2M
$33.7M
Q1 24
$29.4M
Q4 23
$26.1M
Q3 23
$56.3M
Debt / Equity
KITT
KITT
RETO
RETO
Q4 25
3.06×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q4 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
Q4 23
Q3 23

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KITT
KITT
RETO
RETO
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-4.1M
$-1.6M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-5.0M
$-1.7M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-470.4%
-157.4%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
86.4%
5.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-21.5M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KITT
KITT
RETO
RETO
Q4 25
$-4.1M
Q3 25
$-4.9M
Q2 25
$-7.4M
$-1.6M
Q4 24
$-4.2M
Q2 24
$-8.4M
$-4.8M
Q1 24
$-6.7M
Q4 23
$-5.1M
Q3 23
$-3.6M
Free Cash Flow
KITT
KITT
RETO
RETO
Q4 25
$-5.0M
Q3 25
$-4.9M
Q2 25
$-7.4M
$-1.7M
Q4 24
$-4.3M
Q2 24
$-8.4M
Q1 24
$-7.0M
Q4 23
$-5.9M
Q3 23
$-8.3M
FCF Margin
KITT
KITT
RETO
RETO
Q4 25
-470.4%
Q3 25
-249.8%
Q2 25
-354.5%
-157.4%
Q4 24
-903.5%
Q2 24
-1678.0%
Q1 24
-1504.1%
Q4 23
-559.4%
Q3 23
-518.1%
Capex Intensity
KITT
KITT
RETO
RETO
Q4 25
86.4%
Q3 25
0.1%
Q2 25
0.0%
5.1%
Q4 24
7.4%
Q2 24
5.5%
Q1 24
69.8%
Q4 23
83.5%
Q3 23
291.3%
Cash Conversion
KITT
KITT
RETO
RETO
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q4 24
Q2 24
-1.85×
Q1 24
Q4 23
Q3 23

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons