vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KLA Corporation (KLAC) and LG Display Co., Ltd. (LPL), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KLA Corporation is an American company based in Milpitas, California that makes wafer fab equipment. It supplies process control and yield management systems for the semiconductor industry and other related nanoelectronics industries. The company's products and services are intended for all phases of wafer, reticle, integrated circuit (IC) and packaging production, from research and development to final volume manufacturing.
LG Display Co., Ltd. is one of the world's largest manufacturers and supplier of thin-film transistor liquid crystal display (TFT-LCD) panels, OLEDs and flexible displays. LG Display is headquartered in Seoul, South Korea, and currently operates nine fabrication facilities and seven back-end assembly facilities in South Korea, China, Poland and Mexico.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $824.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $945.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $836.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $601.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | 61.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 61.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 57.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 34.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | $8.68 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.47 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.04 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.16 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.16 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.01 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.16 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.43 | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
