vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC (KLIC) and Mistras Group, Inc. (MG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($199.6M vs $181.5M, roughly 1.1× Mistras Group, Inc.). KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 8.4% vs 2.1%, a 6.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.2% vs 5.1%). Mistras Group, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($26.0M vs $-11.6M).
Kulicke & Soffa Industries Inc. is a leading global provider of semiconductor packaging and assembly equipment, materials, and process solutions. It serves semiconductor manufacturers across automotive electronics, consumer devices, industrial systems, and high-performance computing markets, with core offerings covering wire bonding and advanced packaging technologies.
Mistras Group, Inc. is a global provider of asset integrity and protection solutions, offering non-destructive testing, inspection, real-time monitoring, and engineering consulting services. Its key client segments include oil and gas, aerospace, power generation, and manufacturing industries, with operations spanning North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific, helping clients enhance operational safety, extend asset lifespans, and minimize unplanned downtime.
KLIC vs MG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $199.6M | $181.5M |
| Net Profit | $16.8M | $3.8M |
| Gross Margin | 49.6% | 28.4% |
| Operating Margin | 8.9% | 7.0% |
| Net Margin | 8.4% | 2.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.2% | 5.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -79.4% | -27.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.32 | $0.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $199.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $181.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $195.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $185.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $161.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $172.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $182.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $189.8M |
| Q1 26 | $16.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.4M |
| Q1 26 | 49.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 28.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 29.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 29.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 25.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 26.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 27.1% |
| Q1 26 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.3% |
| Q1 26 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.32 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $481.1M | $28.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $178.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $825.0M | $235.1M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $578.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.76× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $481.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $28.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $27.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $20.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $18.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $20.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $17.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $178.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $202.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $189.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $171.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $169.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $189.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $199.7M |
| Q1 26 | $825.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $235.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $227.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $215.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $198.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $198.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $205.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $193.2M |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $578.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $596.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $571.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $526.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $523.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $551.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $548.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.76× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.89× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.85× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.03× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-8.9M | $32.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-11.6M | $26.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -5.8% | 14.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.53× | 8.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $8.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-8.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $32.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-9.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $25.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $19.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.5M |
| Q1 26 | $-11.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-14.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $22.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $14.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-284.0K |
| Q1 26 | -5.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.1% |
| Q1 26 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.5% |
| Q1 26 | -0.53× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.55× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -3.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.02× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.71× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KLIC
| Ball Bonding Equipment Segment | $110.3M | 55% |
| Aftermarket Products And Services APS Segment Post Cessation | $45.1M | 23% |
| Wedge Bonding Equipment Segment | $21.1M | 11% |
| Automotiveand Industrial | $13.6M | 7% |
| All Others Segment | $11.4M | 6% |
MG
Segment breakdown not available.
