vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC (KLIC) and Navios Maritime Partners L.P. (NMM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($327.6M vs $199.6M, roughly 1.6× KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC). Navios Maritime Partners L.P. runs the higher net margin — 21.4% vs 8.4%, a 12.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.2% vs -4.3%).
Kulicke & Soffa Industries Inc. is a leading global provider of semiconductor packaging and assembly equipment, materials, and process solutions. It serves semiconductor manufacturers across automotive electronics, consumer devices, industrial systems, and high-performance computing markets, with core offerings covering wire bonding and advanced packaging technologies.
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. is a multinational, vertically integrated seaborne shipping and logistics company focused on the transport and transshipment of drybulk commodities including iron ore, coal and grain.
KLIC vs NMM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $199.6M | $327.6M |
| Net Profit | $16.8M | $69.9M |
| Gross Margin | 49.6% | 90.5% |
| Operating Margin | 8.9% | — |
| Net Margin | 8.4% | 21.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.2% | -4.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -79.4% | -31.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.32 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $199.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $327.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $342.2M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $346.9M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $280.7M |
| Q1 26 | $16.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $69.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $101.5M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $112.3M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $118.2M |
| Q1 26 | 49.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 90.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 88.3% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 87.9% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 92.3% |
| Q1 26 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 29.7% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 32.4% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 42.1% |
| Q1 26 | $0.32 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $481.1M | $377.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $825.0M | — |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $5.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $481.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $377.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $272.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $261.4M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $163.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $825.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $3.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 0.54× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-8.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-11.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -5.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.53× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-8.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $-11.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | -5.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | -0.53× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KLIC
| Ball Bonding Equipment Segment | $110.3M | 55% |
| Aftermarket Products And Services APS Segment Post Cessation | $45.1M | 23% |
| Wedge Bonding Equipment Segment | $21.1M | 11% |
| Automotiveand Industrial | $13.6M | 7% |
| All Others Segment | $11.4M | 6% |
NMM
Segment breakdown not available.
