vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC (KLIC) and PHIBRO ANIMAL HEALTH CORP (PAHC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PHIBRO ANIMAL HEALTH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($373.9M vs $199.6M, roughly 1.9× KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC). KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 8.4% vs 7.3%, a 1.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PHIBRO ANIMAL HEALTH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.9% vs 20.2%). PHIBRO ANIMAL HEALTH CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($8.3M vs $-11.6M).
Kulicke & Soffa Industries Inc. is a leading global provider of semiconductor packaging and assembly equipment, materials, and process solutions. It serves semiconductor manufacturers across automotive electronics, consumer devices, industrial systems, and high-performance computing markets, with core offerings covering wire bonding and advanced packaging technologies.
Phibro Animal Health Corporation is an American animal health and mineral nutrition company. Its products include antibacterials, anticoccidials, anthelmintics, as well as animal nutrition and vaccines for livestock. The company operates through three segments Mineral Nutrition, Performance Materials, and Animal Health, from which most of its revenue is derived. The company operates in the United States, Latin America, Canada, Europe, Middle East, Africa, and Asia-Pacific. It is incorporated ...
KLIC vs PAHC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $199.6M | $373.9M |
| Net Profit | $16.8M | $27.5M |
| Gross Margin | 49.6% | 35.5% |
| Operating Margin | 8.9% | 13.5% |
| Net Margin | 8.4% | 7.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.2% | 20.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -79.4% | 762.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.32 | $0.67 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $199.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $373.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $363.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $378.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $347.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $309.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $260.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $273.2M |
| Q1 26 | $16.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $27.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $26.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $17.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $20.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $752.0K |
| Q1 26 | 49.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 35.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 32.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 29.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 30.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 32.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 31.9% |
| Q1 26 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.7% |
| Q1 26 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.3% |
| Q1 26 | $0.32 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.67 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.65 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.43 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.51 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $481.1M | $74.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $624.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $825.0M | $332.4M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.88× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $481.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $74.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $85.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $77.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $70.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $67.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $89.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $114.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $624.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $628.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $631.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $635.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $639.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $295.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $312.1M |
| Q1 26 | $825.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $332.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $311.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $285.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $266.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $246.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $258.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $256.6M |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $966.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $982.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.88× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.01× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.39× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.59× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.22× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-8.9M | $19.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-11.6M | $8.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -5.8% | 2.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | 3.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.53× | 0.70× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $47.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-8.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $21.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $43.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $28.4M |
| Q1 26 | $-11.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $35.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $15.4M |
| Q1 26 | -5.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.8% |
| Q1 26 | -0.53× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.97× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.81× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 37.80× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KLIC
| Ball Bonding Equipment Segment | $110.3M | 55% |
| Aftermarket Products And Services APS Segment Post Cessation | $45.1M | 23% |
| Wedge Bonding Equipment Segment | $21.1M | 11% |
| Automotiveand Industrial | $13.6M | 7% |
| All Others Segment | $11.4M | 6% |
PAHC
| Medicated Feed Additives And Others | $202.1M | 54% |
| Mineral Nutrition | $68.9M | 18% |
| Nutritional Specialties | $50.2M | 13% |
| Vaccines | $37.6M | 10% |
| Performance Products | $15.0M | 4% |
