vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC (KLIC) and PicoCELA Inc. (PCLA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PicoCELA Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($252.6M vs $199.6M, roughly 1.3× KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC). KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 8.4% vs -125.2%, a 133.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-11.6M vs $-256.6M).
Kulicke & Soffa Industries Inc. is a leading global provider of semiconductor packaging and assembly equipment, materials, and process solutions. It serves semiconductor manufacturers across automotive electronics, consumer devices, industrial systems, and high-performance computing markets, with core offerings covering wire bonding and advanced packaging technologies.
PicoCELA Inc. is a global technology company specializing in low-power, high-reliability wireless connectivity solutions, including Wi-Fi HaLow modules and edge network infrastructure. It caters to industrial IoT, smart city, retail, and smart home segments, with a primary operational footprint across Asia, North America, and European markets.
KLIC vs PCLA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $199.6M | $252.6M |
| Net Profit | $16.8M | $-316.2M |
| Gross Margin | 49.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 8.9% | -114.8% |
| Net Margin | 8.4% | -125.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.2% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -79.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.32 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $481.1M | $456.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $825.0M | $354.8M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $481.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $456.8M |
| Q1 26 | $825.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $354.8M |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-8.9M | $-245.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-11.6M | $-256.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -5.8% | -101.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | 4.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.53× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-8.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-245.6M |
| Q1 26 | $-11.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-256.6M |
| Q1 26 | -5.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -101.6% |
| Q1 26 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.3% |
| Q1 26 | -0.53× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KLIC
| Ball Bonding Equipment Segment | $110.3M | 55% |
| Aftermarket Products And Services APS Segment Post Cessation | $45.1M | 23% |
| Wedge Bonding Equipment Segment | $21.1M | 11% |
| Automotiveand Industrial | $13.6M | 7% |
| All Others Segment | $11.4M | 6% |
PCLA
| Revenue from product | $179.1M | 71% |
| Revenue from SaaS, Maintenance and others | $42.4M | 17% |
| Revenue from product – related party | $31.0M | 12% |
