vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC (KLIC) and Smith Douglas Homes Corp. (SDHC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Smith Douglas Homes Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($260.4M vs $199.6M, roughly 1.3× KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC). KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 8.4% vs 1.4%, a 7.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.2% vs -9.4%). Smith Douglas Homes Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($8.7M vs $-11.6M).
Kulicke & Soffa Industries Inc. is a leading global provider of semiconductor packaging and assembly equipment, materials, and process solutions. It serves semiconductor manufacturers across automotive electronics, consumer devices, industrial systems, and high-performance computing markets, with core offerings covering wire bonding and advanced packaging technologies.
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (S&W) is an American firearm manufacturer headquartered in Maryville, Tennessee, United States.
KLIC vs SDHC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $199.6M | $260.4M |
| Net Profit | $16.8M | $3.5M |
| Gross Margin | 49.6% | 19.9% |
| Operating Margin | 8.9% | 6.5% |
| Net Margin | 8.4% | 1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.2% | -9.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -79.4% | -14.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.32 | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $199.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $260.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $262.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $223.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $224.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $287.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $277.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $220.9M |
| Q1 26 | $16.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.6M |
| Q1 26 | 49.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 23.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 26.7% |
| Q1 26 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.7% |
| Q1 26 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.7% |
| Q1 26 | $0.32 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.39 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $481.1M | $12.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $825.0M | $86.7M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $557.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $481.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $12.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $16.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $23.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $17.3M |
| Q1 26 | $825.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $86.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $80.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $76.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $73.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $68.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $62.1M |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $557.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $571.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $570.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $513.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $475.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $460.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $429.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-8.9M | $9.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-11.6M | $8.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -5.8% | 3.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.53× | 2.77× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-36.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-8.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $9.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $22.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-28.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-34.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $22.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $39.0K |
| Q1 26 | $-11.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $8.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $21.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-31.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-35.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $22.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.1M |
| Q1 26 | -5.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1.0% |
| Q1 26 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.0% |
| Q1 26 | -0.53× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.70× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -12.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -13.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.28× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KLIC
| Ball Bonding Equipment Segment | $110.3M | 55% |
| Aftermarket Products And Services APS Segment Post Cessation | $45.1M | 23% |
| Wedge Bonding Equipment Segment | $21.1M | 11% |
| Automotiveand Industrial | $13.6M | 7% |
| All Others Segment | $11.4M | 6% |
SDHC
| Southeast | $164.7M | 63% |
| Central | $95.8M | 37% |
