vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC (KLIC) and STARZ ENTERTAINMENT CORP (STRZ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
STARZ ENTERTAINMENT CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($320.9M vs $199.6M, roughly 1.6× KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC). KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 8.4% vs -16.4%, a 24.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.2% vs -7.5%). KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-11.6M vs $-31.3M).
Kulicke & Soffa Industries Inc. is a leading global provider of semiconductor packaging and assembly equipment, materials, and process solutions. It serves semiconductor manufacturers across automotive electronics, consumer devices, industrial systems, and high-performance computing markets, with core offerings covering wire bonding and advanced packaging technologies.
Starz Entertainment Corp., formerly known as Lions Gate Entertainment Corporation, or simply Lionsgate, is a Canadian-American entertainment company currently headquartered in Santa Monica, California. Founded by Frank Giustra on July 10, 1997, it is/was domiciled and incorporated in Vancouver, British Columbia.
KLIC vs STRZ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $199.6M | $320.9M |
| Net Profit | $16.8M | $-52.6M |
| Gross Margin | 49.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 8.9% | -10.8% |
| Net Margin | 8.4% | -16.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.2% | -7.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -79.4% | -71.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.32 | $-3.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $199.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $320.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $319.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $970.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $346.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $347.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $975.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $16.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-52.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-42.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-21.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-30.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-106.6M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-886.2M |
| Q1 26 | 49.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -10.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -8.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -4.5% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -80.5% |
| Q1 26 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -16.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -8.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -10.9% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -87.3% |
| Q1 26 | $0.32 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-3.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.54 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.83 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.26 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-0.45 | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-3.79 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $481.1M | $37.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $608.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $825.0M | $663.2M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.92× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $481.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $51.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $200.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $229.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $192.5M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $283.0M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $223.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $608.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $611.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $1.9B |
| Q1 26 | $825.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $663.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $712.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-168.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $935.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $973.1M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-325.5M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-221.1M |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $6.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.92× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-8.9M | $-26.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-11.6M | $-31.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -5.8% | -9.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.53× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-317.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-8.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-26.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $65.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-335.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-33.5M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $71.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $301.1M |
| Q1 26 | $-11.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-31.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $58.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-349.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-38.4M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $64.7M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $291.7M |
| Q1 26 | -5.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -36.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -11.0% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 28.7% |
| Q1 26 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 0.9% |
| Q1 26 | -0.53× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -7.98× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KLIC
| Ball Bonding Equipment Segment | $110.3M | 55% |
| Aftermarket Products And Services APS Segment Post Cessation | $45.1M | 23% |
| Wedge Bonding Equipment Segment | $21.1M | 11% |
| Automotiveand Industrial | $13.6M | 7% |
| All Others Segment | $11.4M | 6% |
STRZ
| Over The Top Subscription Service OTT | $222.8M | 69% |
| Linear Subscription Service | $98.1M | 31% |