vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC (KLIC) and Vroom, Inc. (VRM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Vroom, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($235.9M vs $199.6M, roughly 1.2× KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC). KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 8.4% vs -59.8%, a 68.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.2% vs 12.9%). KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-11.6M vs $-108.8M).
Kulicke & Soffa Industries Inc. is a leading global provider of semiconductor packaging and assembly equipment, materials, and process solutions. It serves semiconductor manufacturers across automotive electronics, consumer devices, industrial systems, and high-performance computing markets, with core offerings covering wire bonding and advanced packaging technologies.
Vroom, Inc. is a parent company of United Auto Credit Corporation (UACC) and CarStory. Previously, Vroom was a used car retailer and e-commerce company that let consumers buy, sell, and finance cars online. Vroom ceased e-commerce automotive sales operations on January 22, 2024.
KLIC vs VRM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2023
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $199.6M | $235.9M |
| Net Profit | $16.8M | $-141.1M |
| Gross Margin | 49.6% | 12.3% |
| Operating Margin | 8.9% | -11.5% |
| Net Margin | 8.4% | -59.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.2% | 12.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -79.4% | -669.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.32 | $-80.66 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $199.6M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $235.9M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $235.6M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $225.2M | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $196.5M | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $208.9M | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $340.8M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $475.4M |
| Q1 26 | $16.8M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-141.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-82.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-66.0M | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $-74.7M | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $24.8M | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $-51.1M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-115.1M |
| Q1 26 | 49.6% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 12.3% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 20.4% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 23 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q4 22 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 14.0% |
| Q1 26 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -11.5% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -18.0% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -23.4% | ||
| Q1 23 | — | -34.7% | ||
| Q4 22 | — | -37.2% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | -22.9% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -21.0% |
| Q1 26 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -59.8% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -35.1% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -29.3% | ||
| Q1 23 | — | -38.0% | ||
| Q4 22 | — | 11.9% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | -15.0% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -24.2% |
| Q1 26 | $0.32 | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-80.66 | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-47.38 | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-37.97 | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $-43.16 | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $-0.37 | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-0.83 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $481.1M | $135.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $454.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $825.0M | $127.7M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.56× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $481.1M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $135.6M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $208.6M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $237.9M | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $316.7M | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $398.9M | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $509.7M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $532.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $454.2M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $521.4M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $544.9M | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $554.7M | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $402.2M | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $607.8M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $674.3M |
| Q1 26 | $825.0M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $127.7M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $263.6M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $343.4M | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $407.1M | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $479.8M | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $445.1M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $495.1M |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $2.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 3.56× | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 1.98× | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 1.59× | ||
| Q1 23 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q4 22 | — | 0.84× | ||
| Q3 22 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 1.36× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-8.9M | $-108.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-11.6M | $-108.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -5.8% | -46.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.53× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-536.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-8.9M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-108.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-193.5M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-147.1M | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $-85.0M | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $-86.0M | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $114.4M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-122.4M |
| Q1 26 | $-11.6M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-108.8M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-194.2M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-147.5M | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $-85.8M | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $-90.2M | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $110.5M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-131.4M |
| Q1 26 | -5.8% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -46.1% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -82.4% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -65.5% | ||
| Q1 23 | — | -43.7% | ||
| Q4 22 | — | -43.2% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | 32.4% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -27.6% |
| Q1 26 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 23 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 22 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | -0.53× | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | -3.47× | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KLIC
| Ball Bonding Equipment Segment | $110.3M | 55% |
| Aftermarket Products And Services APS Segment Post Cessation | $45.1M | 23% |
| Wedge Bonding Equipment Segment | $21.1M | 11% |
| Automotiveand Industrial | $13.6M | 7% |
| All Others Segment | $11.4M | 6% |
VRM
Segment breakdown not available.
