vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimberly-Clark (KMB) and SMITHFIELD FOODS INC (SFD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kimberly-Clark is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.2B vs $3.8B, roughly 1.1× SMITHFIELD FOODS INC). Kimberly-Clark runs the higher net margin — 16.2% vs 6.6%, a 9.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kimberly-Clark posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.7% vs 0.8%). Over the past eight quarters, SMITHFIELD FOODS INC's revenue compounded faster (6.8% CAGR vs -9.0%).
Kimberly-Clark Corporation is an American multinational consumer goods and personal care corporation that produces mostly paper-based consumer products. The company manufactures sanitary paper products and surgical & medical instruments. Kimberly-Clark brand name products include Kleenex facial tissue, Kotex feminine hygiene products, Cottonelle, Scott and Andrex toilet paper, Wypall utility wipes, KimWipes scientific cleaning wipes and Huggies disposable diapers and baby wipes.
Smithfield Foods, Inc., is a Hong Kong-owned pork producer and food-processing company based in Smithfield, Virginia. Founded in 1936 as the Smithfield Packing Company by Joseph W. Luter and his son, the company is the largest pig and pork producer in the world. In addition to owning over 500 farms in the US, Smithfield contracts with another 2,000 independent farms around the country to raise Smithfield's pigs. Outside the US, the company has facilities in Mexico, Poland, Romania, Germany, S...
KMB vs SFD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2027
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.2B | $3.8B |
| Net Profit | $675.0M | $249.0M |
| Gross Margin | 36.8% | 13.4% |
| Operating Margin | 18.1% | 8.8% |
| Net Margin | 16.2% | 6.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.7% | 0.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 17.3% | 9.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.00 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $4.2B | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.9B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $675.0M | $249.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $499.0M | $327.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $446.0M | $248.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $509.0M | $188.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $567.0M | $224.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $447.0M | $205.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $907.0M | $291.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $544.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | 36.8% | 13.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 37.7% | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.0% | 12.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.0% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.8% | 13.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.0% | 13.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.0% | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | 18.1% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.2% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.0% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.2% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.9% | 8.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.1% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.3% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | 16.2% | 6.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.1% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.2% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.7% | 5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.3% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.00 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.50 | $0.83 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.34 | $0.63 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.53 | $0.48 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.70 | $0.57 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.34 | $0.54 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.69 | $0.77 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.61 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $542.0K | $1.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $6.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9M | $6.9B |
| Total Assets | $17.2M | $12.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.38× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $542.0K | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $688.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $617.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $634.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $563.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.9M | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $6.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $6.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $840.0M | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $17.2M | $12.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $17.1B | $12.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.9B | $11.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.8B | $11.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.3B | $11.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.5B | $11.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.3B | — |
| Q1 26 | 3.38× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.31× | 0.29× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.86× | 0.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.09× | 0.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.89× | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.18× | 0.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.36× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.30× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KMB
| NA | $2.7B | 64% |
| IPC | $1.5B | 36% |
SFD
Segment breakdown not available.
