vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of KAMADA LTD (KMDA) and Scienjoy Holding Corp (SJ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Scienjoy Holding Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($91.6M vs $47.0M, roughly 1.9× KAMADA LTD).

Kamada Ltd. is a global biopharmaceutical company specializing in the research, manufacturing, and commercialization of specialty pharmaceuticals derived from human plasma.

Scienjoy Holding Corp is a China-based digital entertainment company that principally operates interactive live streaming platforms. It provides diverse content including talent performances, music shows, and lifestyle broadcasts, serving mass consumer audiences of varying age groups across the domestic market, with core business centered on mobile internet entertainment services.

KMDA vs SJ — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
SJ
SJ
1.9× larger
SJ
$91.6M
$47.0M
KMDA

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025

Metric
KMDA
KMDA
SJ
SJ
Revenue
$47.0M
$91.6M
Net Profit
$5.3M
Gross Margin
42.0%
Operating Margin
16.6%
Net Margin
11.3%
Revenue YoY
12.6%
Net Profit YoY
37.1%
EPS (diluted)
$0.09

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KMDA
KMDA
SJ
SJ
Q3 25
$47.0M
Q2 25
$44.8M
$91.6M
Q1 25
$44.0M
Q3 24
$41.7M
Q2 24
$42.5M
Q1 24
$37.7M
Q3 23
$37.9M
Q2 23
$37.4M
$50.1M
Net Profit
KMDA
KMDA
SJ
SJ
Q3 25
$5.3M
Q2 25
$7.4M
Q1 25
$4.0M
Q3 24
$3.9M
Q2 24
$4.4M
Q1 24
$2.4M
Q3 23
$3.2M
Q2 23
$1.8M
$11.7M
Gross Margin
KMDA
KMDA
SJ
SJ
Q3 25
42.0%
Q2 25
42.3%
Q1 25
47.1%
Q3 24
41.3%
Q2 24
44.6%
Q1 24
44.4%
Q3 23
39.0%
Q2 23
38.6%
13.9%
Operating Margin
KMDA
KMDA
SJ
SJ
Q3 25
16.6%
Q2 25
15.8%
Q1 25
17.7%
Q3 24
12.7%
Q2 24
13.3%
Q1 24
10.7%
Q3 23
11.5%
Q2 23
7.0%
3.2%
Net Margin
KMDA
KMDA
SJ
SJ
Q3 25
11.3%
Q2 25
16.5%
Q1 25
9.0%
Q3 24
9.3%
Q2 24
10.4%
Q1 24
6.3%
Q3 23
8.5%
Q2 23
4.8%
23.3%
EPS (diluted)
KMDA
KMDA
SJ
SJ
Q3 25
$0.09
Q2 25
$0.13
Q1 25
$0.07
Q3 24
$0.07
Q2 24
$0.08
Q1 24
$0.04
Q3 23
$0.06
Q2 23
$0.04
$0.29

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KMDA
KMDA
SJ
SJ
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$72.0M
$913.0K
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$265.2M
$170.2M
Total Assets
$377.2M
$199.9M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KMDA
KMDA
SJ
SJ
Q3 25
$72.0M
Q2 25
$66.0M
$913.0K
Q1 25
$76.3M
Q3 24
$72.0M
Q2 24
$56.5M
Q1 24
$48.2M
Q3 23
$52.6M
Q2 23
$21.8M
$42.5M
Stockholders' Equity
KMDA
KMDA
SJ
SJ
Q3 25
$265.2M
Q2 25
$260.0M
$170.2M
Q1 25
$252.0M
Q3 24
$255.3M
Q2 24
$251.2M
Q1 24
$251.2M
Q3 23
$238.4M
Q2 23
$176.8M
$172.4M
Total Assets
KMDA
KMDA
SJ
SJ
Q3 25
$377.2M
Q2 25
$368.2M
$199.9M
Q1 25
$375.1M
Q3 24
$351.2M
Q2 24
$351.0M
Q1 24
$343.2M
Q3 23
$337.1M
Q2 23
$314.4M
$207.7M

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KMDA
KMDA
SJ
SJ
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$10.4M
$7.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$7.1M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
7.7%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.97×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KMDA
KMDA
SJ
SJ
Q3 25
$10.4M
Q2 25
$8.0M
$7.1M
Q1 25
$-513.0K
Q3 24
$22.2M
Q2 24
$14.0M
Q1 24
$1.0M
Q3 23
$921.0K
Q2 23
$1.8M
Free Cash Flow
KMDA
KMDA
SJ
SJ
Q3 25
Q2 25
$7.1M
Q1 25
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
Q3 23
Q2 23
FCF Margin
KMDA
KMDA
SJ
SJ
Q3 25
Q2 25
7.7%
Q1 25
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
Q3 23
Q2 23
Capex Intensity
KMDA
KMDA
SJ
SJ
Q3 25
Q2 25
0.0%
Q1 25
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
Q3 23
Q2 23
Cash Conversion
KMDA
KMDA
SJ
SJ
Q3 25
1.97×
Q2 25
1.09×
Q1 25
-0.13×
Q3 24
5.75×
Q2 24
3.15×
Q1 24
0.43×
Q3 23
0.29×
Q2 23
1.00×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons