vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Kinder Morgan (KMI) and Stanley Black & Decker (SWK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kinder Morgan is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.8B vs $3.8B, roughly 1.3× Stanley Black & Decker). Kinder Morgan runs the higher net margin — 20.7% vs 1.4%, a 19.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kinder Morgan posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.8% vs 0.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Kinder Morgan's revenue compounded faster (22.6% CAGR vs 0.3%).
Kinder Morgan, Inc. is one of the largest energy infrastructure companies in North America. The company specializes in owning and controlling oil and gas pipelines and terminals.
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., formerly known as The Stanley Works, is an American manufacturer of industrial tools and household hardware, and a provider of security products. Headquartered in the Greater Hartford city of New Britain, Connecticut, Stanley Black & Decker is the result of the merger of The Stanley Works and Black & Decker on March 12, 2010.
KMI vs SWK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.8B | $3.8B |
| Net Profit | $1.0B | $51.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 31.4% |
| Operating Margin | 29.9% | — |
| Net Margin | 20.7% | 1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.8% | 0.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 34.7% | -43.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $0.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $4.0B |
| Q1 26 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $996.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $628.0M | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $715.0M | $101.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $717.0M | $90.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $667.0M | $194.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $625.0M | $91.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $575.0M | $-11.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 31.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 27.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 30.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 28.4% |
| Q1 26 | 29.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.9% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.3% | 9.5% |
| Q1 26 | 20.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.8% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.6% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.7% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.9% | -0.3% |
| Q1 26 | $0.44 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.45 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.28 | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.32 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.32 | $0.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.30 | $1.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.28 | $0.60 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.26 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $72.0M | $268.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $31.9B | $5.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6B | $9.0B |
| Total Assets | $73.1B | $21.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.98× | 0.59× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $72.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $63.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.0M | $268.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $82.0M | $311.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.0M | $344.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $88.0M | $290.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $108.0M | $298.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.0M | $318.5M |
| Q1 26 | $31.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.1B |
| Q1 26 | $32.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $31.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.7B | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.8B | $9.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.6B | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.5B | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.4B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.3B | $8.7B |
| Q1 26 | $73.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $72.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $72.3B | $21.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.4B | $22.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.3B | $22.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.4B | $21.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $70.9B | $22.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.7B | $22.5B |
| Q1 26 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.70× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $221.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $155.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 4.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 16.7% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.30× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $369.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $221.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $214.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $-420.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $679.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $285.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $573.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $872.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $621.0M | $155.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $134.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $396.0M | $-485.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $738.0M | $564.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $592.0M | $199.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $485.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.7% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.8% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.3% | -13.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.7% | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.0% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.4% | 12.1% |
| Q1 26 | 16.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.6% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.0% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.1% | 2.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.70× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.25× | 4.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.31× | 2.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.62× | -4.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.26× | 3.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.00× | 3.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.93× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KMI
Segment breakdown not available.
SWK
| Tools And Outdoor Segment | $3.3B | 87% |
| Engineered Fastening Segment | $500.5M | 13% |
