vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Kinder Morgan (KMI) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kinder Morgan is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.8B vs $2.5B, roughly 1.9× Tapestry, Inc.). Tapestry, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.4% vs 20.7%, a 1.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tapestry, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs 13.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Tapestry, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (29.9% CAGR vs 22.6%).
Kinder Morgan, Inc. is one of the largest energy infrastructure companies in North America. The company specializes in owning and controlling oil and gas pipelines and terminals.
Tapestry, Inc. is a leading American multinational luxury fashion holding company. It owns three iconic lifestyle brands: Coach, Kate Spade New York, and Stuart Weitzman, offering premium handbags, apparel, footwear, accessories, and fragrances to global consumers via physical retail stores and e-commerce platforms.
KMI vs TPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.8B | $2.5B |
| Net Profit | $1.0B | $561.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | 29.9% | 28.6% |
| Net Margin | 20.7% | 22.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.8% | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 34.7% | 80.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $2.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $996.0M | $561.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $628.0M | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $715.0M | $-517.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $717.0M | $203.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $667.0M | $310.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $625.0M | $186.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $575.0M | $159.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 75.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 76.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 76.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 76.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 74.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 75.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 74.9% |
| Q1 26 | 29.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.0% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.6% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.9% | -33.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.6% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.0% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.9% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.3% | 14.8% |
| Q1 26 | 20.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.8% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.9% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.8% | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.6% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.7% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.9% | 10.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.44 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.45 | $2.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.28 | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.32 | $-2.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.32 | $0.95 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.30 | $1.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.28 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.26 | $0.67 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $72.0M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $31.9B | $2.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6B | $551.2M |
| Total Assets | $73.1B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.98× | 4.32× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $72.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $63.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.0M | $743.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $82.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $88.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $108.0M | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.0M | $7.2B |
| Q1 26 | $31.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.9B |
| Q1 26 | $32.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $31.2B | $551.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.7B | $399.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.8B | $857.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.4B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.3B | $2.9B |
| Q1 26 | $73.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $72.7B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $72.3B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.4B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.3B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.4B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $70.9B | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.7B | $13.4B |
| Q1 26 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.39× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.0B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 41.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 16.7% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.93× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $112.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $446.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $144.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $506.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $256.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $872.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $621.0M | $80.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $411.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $396.0M | $113.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $738.0M | $475.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $592.0M | $93.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $209.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.7% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.7% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.8% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.3% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.7% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.0% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.4% | 13.2% |
| Q1 26 | 16.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.3% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.6% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.1% | 2.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.70× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.25× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.31× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.62× | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.26× | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.00× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.93× | 1.61× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KMI
Segment breakdown not available.
TPR
| Coach | $1.4B | 57% |
| Other | $787.0M | 31% |
| Kate Spade Company | $290.0M | 12% |
