vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KEMPER Corp (KMPR) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tapestry, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.7× KEMPER Corp). Tapestry, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 17.9% vs -0.7%, a 18.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tapestry, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.0% vs -4.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Tapestry, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (9.9% CAGR vs -0.5%).
Kemper Corporation is an American insurance provider with corporate headquarters located in Chicago, Illinois. With nearly $13 billion in assets, the Kemper family of companies provides insurance to individuals, families, and businesses.
Tapestry, Inc. is a leading American multinational luxury fashion holding company. It owns three iconic lifestyle brands: Coach, Kate Spade New York, and Stuart Weitzman, offering premium handbags, apparel, footwear, accessories, and fragrances to global consumers via physical retail stores and e-commerce platforms.
KMPR vs TPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $-8.0M | $343.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 76.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | 22.3% |
| Net Margin | -0.7% | 17.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.7% | 21.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -108.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.03 | $1.65 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $343.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-8.0M | $561.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-21.0M | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.6M | $-517.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.7M | $203.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $97.4M | $310.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $73.7M | $186.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.4M | $159.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 76.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 75.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 76.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 76.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 76.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 74.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 75.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 74.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 22.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -33.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | 14.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.7% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.7% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.9% | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.4% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.2% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.3% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.7% | 10.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.65 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.03 | $2.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.34 | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.12 | $-2.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.54 | $0.95 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.51 | $1.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.14 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.16 | $0.67 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $943.5M | $2.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $682.4M |
| Total Assets | $12.5B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.35× | 3.48× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $371.2M | $743.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $407.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $696.9M | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $539.1M | $7.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $943.5M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $943.1M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $942.6M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $942.1M | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $6.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $682.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $551.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $399.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $370.0M | $857.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $366.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $358.0M | $2.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.5B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.4B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.6B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.5B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.6B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.6B | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.6B | $13.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.48× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.35× | 4.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.35× | 5.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.55× | 2.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.57× | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.50× | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.50× | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.88× | 2.39× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $175.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $166.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 14.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $553.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $175.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $139.9M | $112.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $89.6M | $446.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $180.0M | $144.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $175.1M | $506.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $141.9M | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.9M | $256.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $166.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $133.4M | $80.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $82.0M | $411.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $172.3M | $113.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $165.4M | $475.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $131.4M | $93.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2M | $209.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.7% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.8% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.7% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.4% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.9% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.1% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | 13.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 2.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.23× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.81× | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.80× | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.93× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.30× | 1.61× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KMPR
| Specialty Property Casualty Insurance Segment | $995.1M | 88% |
| Life Insurance Segment1 | $140.7M | 12% |
TPR
Segment breakdown not available.