vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. (KNX) and Science Applications International Corp (SAIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Science Applications International Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.9B, roughly 1.0× Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.). Science Applications International Corp runs the higher net margin — 4.2% vs 0.0%, a 4.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Science Applications International Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.6% vs 1.4%). Science Applications International Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($120.0M vs $56.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Science Applications International Corp's revenue compounded faster (2.3% CAGR vs 0.1%).
Swift Transportation is an American truckload motor shipping carrier based in Phoenix, Arizona. In 2017, Swift merged with Knight Transportation, also of Phoenix, forming Knight-Swift.
Science Applications International Corporation, Inc. (SAIC) is an American technology company headquartered in Reston, Virginia that provides government services and information technology support.
KNX vs SAIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $96.0K | $78.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 12.2% |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | 6.9% |
| Net Margin | 0.0% | 4.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.4% | 2.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -76.6% | -3.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | $1.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | $96.0K | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-6.8M | $78.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.2M | $68.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $69.5M | $106.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.5M | $81.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.3M | $77.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.5% |
| Q1 26 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.2% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.3% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.4% | 7.1% |
| Q1 26 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.4% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 4.2% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.04 | $1.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.21 | $1.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.19 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.43 | $2.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.19 | $1.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.13 | $1.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $222.8M | $45.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.1B | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $11.9B | $5.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.64× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $222.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $220.4M | $45.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $192.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $216.3M | $47.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $209.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $218.3M | $46.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $166.3M | $48.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $186.5M | $49.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $2.1B |
| Q1 26 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | $11.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.0B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.5B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.7B | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.8B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.6B | $5.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.25× | 1.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.26× | 1.52× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.26× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.26× | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.23× | 1.18× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $142.5M | $129.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $56.9M | $120.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.1% | 6.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.6% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1484.79× | 1.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $478.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $142.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $723.2M | $129.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $217.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $216.5M | $100.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $109.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $274.3M | $143.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $214.0M | $138.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $273.4M | $98.0M |
| Q1 26 | $56.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $120.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $92.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $132.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $92.0M |
| Q1 26 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.0% |
| Q1 26 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.3% |
| Q1 26 | 1484.79× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.67× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.32× | 1.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.57× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.95× | 1.35× | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.03× | 1.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.47× | 1.27× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KNX
| Revenue, excluding truckload and LTL fuel surcharge | $1.6B | 89% |
| Truckload and LTL fuel surcharge | $212.2M | 11% |
SAIC
| Prime Contractor | $1.3B | 71% |
| Civilian | $427.0M | 23% |
| Subcontractor | $116.0M | 6% |
| Commercial State And Local Agencies | $7.0M | 0% |
