vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Koppers Holdings Inc. (KOP) and TIC Solutions, Inc. (TIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TIC Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($508.3M vs $432.7M, roughly 1.2× Koppers Holdings Inc.). Koppers Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 6.9% vs -9.3%, a 16.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. TIC Solutions, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($37.1M vs $28.5M).
Koppers is a global chemical and materials company based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States. Its headquarters is an art-deco 1920s skyscraper, the Koppers Tower.
KOP vs TIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $432.7M | $508.3M |
| Net Profit | $29.7M | $-47.2M |
| Gross Margin | 25.6% | 35.2% |
| Operating Margin | 11.5% | -3.8% |
| Net Margin | 6.9% | -9.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 391.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.44 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $432.7M | $508.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $485.3M | $473.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $504.8M | $313.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $456.5M | $234.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $477.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $554.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $563.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $497.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $29.7M | $-47.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.8M | $-13.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.4M | $-233.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.9M | $-25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-10.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 25.6% | 35.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.1% | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.6% | 23.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.2% | 18.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 11.5% | -3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.9% | -4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | -9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | -2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.0% | -11.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.44 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.17 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.81 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.68 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.47 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.09 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.25 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.59 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $439.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $928.3M | $1.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $574.0M | $2.2B |
| Total Assets | $1.9B | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.62× | 0.74× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $439.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $130.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $155.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $928.3M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $932.9M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $977.5M | $751.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $989.0M | $752.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $939.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $989.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $877.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $574.0M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $545.6M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $526.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $498.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $488.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $532.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $509.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $505.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.62× | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.71× | 0.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.86× | 0.64× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.99× | 0.67× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.92× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.86× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.97× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.74× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $45.1M | $49.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $28.5M | $37.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.6% | 7.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.52× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $67.5M | $61.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $45.1M | $49.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.6M | $19.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.5M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.7M | $32.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-12.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $28.5M | $37.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.6M | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.4M | $-14.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-37.0M | $28.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-38.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.1% | 12.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.52× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.08× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.08× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.31× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.01× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.95× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KOP
| Other | $127.8M | 30% |
| Railroad Treated Products | $119.0M | 28% |
| Utility Poles | $79.8M | 18% |
| Pitch And Related Products | $74.1M | 17% |
| Carbon Black Feedstock And Distillates | $14.4M | 3% |
| Railroad Infrastructure Products And Services | $9.9M | 2% |
| Phthalic Anhydride Naphthalene And Other Chemicals | $7.7M | 2% |
TIC
| Consulting Engineering Segment | $300.1M | 59% |
| Geospatial Segment | $131.3M | 26% |
| Fixed Unit Price Contracts | $54.3M | 11% |
| Other | $22.6M | 4% |
