vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Koppers Holdings Inc. (KOP) and Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Koppers Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($432.7M vs $394.6M, roughly 1.1× Zeta Global Holdings Corp.). Koppers Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 6.9% vs 1.7%, a 5.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Zeta Global Holdings Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.4% vs -9.3%). Zeta Global Holdings Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($60.9M vs $28.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Zeta Global Holdings Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (42.3% CAGR vs -6.7%).
Koppers is a global chemical and materials company based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States. Its headquarters is an art-deco 1920s skyscraper, the Koppers Tower.
Zeta Global Holdings Corp. is an American marketing technology company which was founded in 2007. Zeta offers companies a suite of multichannel marketing tools focused on creating, maintaining, and monetizing customer relationships. The company went public on the New York Stock Exchange on June 10, 2021, at a US$1.7 billion valuation.
KOP vs ZETA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $432.7M | $394.6M |
| Net Profit | $29.7M | $6.5M |
| Gross Margin | 25.6% | 59.5% |
| Operating Margin | 11.5% | 4.5% |
| Net Margin | 6.9% | 1.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.3% | 25.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 391.2% | -57.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.44 | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $432.7M | $394.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $485.3M | $337.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $504.8M | $308.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $456.5M | $264.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $477.0M | $314.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $554.3M | $268.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $563.2M | $227.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $497.6M | $194.9M |
| Q4 25 | $29.7M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.8M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.4M | $-12.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.9M | $-21.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-10.2M | $15.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.8M | $-17.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.8M | $-28.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.0M | $-39.6M |
| Q4 25 | 25.6% | 59.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.1% | 60.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.6% | 62.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.2% | 60.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | 60.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.9% | 60.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.6% | 60.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.3% | 60.6% |
| Q4 25 | 11.5% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | -1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.9% | -6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | -4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.2% | -11.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.0% | -18.4% |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | -1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | -4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.0% | -8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.1% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | -6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.8% | -12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | -20.3% |
| Q4 25 | $1.44 | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.17 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.81 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.68 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.47 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.09 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.25 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.59 | $-0.23 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $319.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $928.3M | $197.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $574.0M | $804.6M |
| Total Assets | $1.9B | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.62× | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $319.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $385.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $365.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $364.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $366.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $418.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $154.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $141.6M |
| Q4 25 | $928.3M | $197.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $932.9M | $196.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $977.5M | $196.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $989.0M | $196.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $939.5M | $196.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $989.4M | $196.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $184.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $877.6M | $184.2M |
| Q4 25 | $574.0M | $804.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $545.6M | $689.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $526.8M | $673.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $498.0M | $676.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $488.7M | $676.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $532.3M | $474.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $509.2M | $217.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $505.8M | $191.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $869.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $583.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $550.3M |
| Q4 25 | 1.62× | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.71× | 0.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.86× | 0.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.99× | 0.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.92× | 0.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.86× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.97× | 0.85× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.74× | 0.96× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $45.1M | $64.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $28.5M | $60.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.6% | 15.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 0.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.52× | 9.81× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $67.5M | $185.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $45.1M | $64.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.6M | $57.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.5M | $42.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.7M | $34.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.7M | $43.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.8M | $34.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.2M | $31.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-12.3M | $24.7M |
| Q4 25 | $28.5M | $60.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.6M | $52.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.4M | $39.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-37.0M | $32.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.1M | $35.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.4M | $29.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.1M | $24.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-38.6M | $18.9M |
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | 12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.1% | 12.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.8% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | 11.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.8% | 9.7% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.3% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.52× | 9.81× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.08× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.08× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.87× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.31× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.01× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.95× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KOP
| Other | $127.8M | 30% |
| Railroad Treated Products | $119.0M | 28% |
| Utility Poles | $79.8M | 18% |
| Pitch And Related Products | $74.1M | 17% |
| Carbon Black Feedstock And Distillates | $14.4M | 3% |
| Railroad Infrastructure Products And Services | $9.9M | 2% |
| Phthalic Anhydride Naphthalene And Other Chemicals | $7.7M | 2% |
ZETA
Segment breakdown not available.
