vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Katapult Holdings, Inc. (KPLT) and Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($143.3M vs $73.9M, roughly 1.9× Katapult Holdings, Inc.). Katapult Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 26.8% vs -31.4%, a 58.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Katapult Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.3% vs 0.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Katapult Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (6.6% CAGR vs 0.0%).
Katapult Holdings, Inc. is a U.S.-based fintech company that provides accessible point-of-sale lease-to-purchase solutions for consumers with limited or no traditional credit history. It partners with a wide network of e-commerce platforms and brick-and-mortar retail merchants across segments including electronics, furniture and home goods to offer flexible payment plans for customers to obtain needed products.
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality office properties primarily located in high-growth metropolitan areas across the United States. It serves corporate tenants across multiple industry sectors including technology, professional services, and healthcare, and pursues stable long-term returns for stakeholders via strategic property management and portfolio optimization.
KPLT vs PDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $73.9M | $143.3M |
| Net Profit | $19.8M | $-45.0M |
| Gross Margin | 15.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -1.4% | — |
| Net Margin | 26.8% | -31.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.3% | 0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 307.3% | -27.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.69 | $-0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $143.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $73.9M | $142.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.0M | $139.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.9M | $140.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.9M | $142.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $63.0M | $143.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.3M | $139.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.9M | $143.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-45.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | $-43.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | $-13.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.8M | $-16.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.7M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.6M | $-30.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.9M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.9M | $-9.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -31.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.8% | -30.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.7% | -9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.9% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.9% | -7.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -15.2% | -20.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.7% | -8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.7% | -6.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.69 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.94 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.63 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.23 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.17 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.05 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.61 | $-0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $22.4M | $2.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-38.1M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $107.9M | $4.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $22.4M | $731.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7M | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5M | $109.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9M | $133.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.7M | $138.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $-38.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-58.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-54.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-51.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-46.8M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-40.3M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-32.9M | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $107.9M | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.9M | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $90.6M | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.5M | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.2M | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.0M | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $106.6M | $4.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.34× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-11.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -16.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 110.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.60× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $140.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $35.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.6M | $50.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-32.6M | $198.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.4M | $42.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-628.0K | $66.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-12.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-32.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-653.0K | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -16.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -51.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -9.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 110.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.60× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
