vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Katapult Holdings, Inc. (KPLT) and RHYTHM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (RYTM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Katapult Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($73.9M vs $57.3M, roughly 1.3× RHYTHM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.). Katapult Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 26.8% vs -83.0%, a 109.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RHYTHM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (36.9% vs 17.3%). Over the past eight quarters, RHYTHM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (48.5% CAGR vs 6.6%).
Katapult Holdings, Inc. is a U.S.-based fintech company that provides accessible point-of-sale lease-to-purchase solutions for consumers with limited or no traditional credit history. It partners with a wide network of e-commerce platforms and brick-and-mortar retail merchants across segments including electronics, furniture and home goods to offer flexible payment plans for customers to obtain needed products.
Rhythm Pharmaceuticals is a biopharmaceutical firm focused on developing and commercializing targeted therapies for rare genetic disorders causing severe unmanageable obesity, including POMC deficiency, LEPR deficiency, and Bardet-Biedl syndrome. It serves patients in North America and Europe who lack effective standard treatments for their chronic life-altering conditions.
KPLT vs RYTM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $73.9M | $57.3M |
| Net Profit | $19.8M | $-47.5M |
| Gross Margin | 15.6% | 91.6% |
| Operating Margin | -1.4% | -82.2% |
| Net Margin | 26.8% | -83.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.3% | 36.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 307.3% | -9.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.69 | $-0.73 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $73.9M | $57.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.0M | $51.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.9M | $48.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.9M | $32.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $63.0M | $41.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.3M | $33.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.9M | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $65.1M | $26.0M |
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | $-47.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | $-52.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.8M | $-46.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.7M | $-49.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.6M | $-43.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.9M | $-43.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.9M | $-32.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-570.0K | $-141.4M |
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | 91.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.7% | 89.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | 88.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 88.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.8% | 90.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.8% | 88.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.9% | 89.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.3% | 89.2% |
| Q4 25 | -1.4% | -82.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | -102.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.0% | -93.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.7% | -143.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.7% | -98.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.4% | -132.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.5% | -139.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.8% | -538.7% |
| Q4 25 | 26.8% | -83.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.7% | -103.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.9% | -96.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.9% | -151.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -15.2% | -103.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.7% | -131.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.7% | -110.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.9% | -544.4% |
| Q4 25 | $3.69 | $-0.73 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.94 | $-0.82 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.63 | $-0.75 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.23 | $-0.81 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.17 | $-0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.05 | $-0.73 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.61 | $-0.55 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.13 | $-2.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $22.4M | $388.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-38.1M | $139.1M |
| Total Assets | $107.9M | $480.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $22.4M | $388.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4M | $416.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7M | $291.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0M | $314.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5M | $320.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9M | $298.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.7M | $319.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.2M | $201.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-38.1M | $139.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-58.4M | $148.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-54.1M | $-11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-51.7M | $18.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-46.8M | $21.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-40.3M | $11.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-32.9M | $39.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-27.5M | $61.6M |
| Q4 25 | $107.9M | $480.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.9M | $506.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $90.6M | $372.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.5M | $386.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.2M | $392.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.0M | $363.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $106.6M | $381.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $106.6M | $258.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-11.9M | $-25.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -16.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.60× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $-25.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $-26.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.6M | $-23.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4M | $-40.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-32.6M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.4M | $-25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-628.0K | $-29.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0M | $-40.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-32.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-653.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -16.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -51.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -9.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.60× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
