vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Katapult Holdings, Inc. (KPLT) and Neuronetics, Inc. (STIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Katapult Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($73.9M vs $41.8M, roughly 1.8× Neuronetics, Inc.). Katapult Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 26.8% vs -17.2%, a 44.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Neuronetics, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (85.7% vs 17.3%). Neuronetics, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($692.0K vs $-12.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Neuronetics, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (54.9% CAGR vs 6.6%).
Katapult Holdings, Inc. is a U.S.-based fintech company that provides accessible point-of-sale lease-to-purchase solutions for consumers with limited or no traditional credit history. It partners with a wide network of e-commerce platforms and brick-and-mortar retail merchants across segments including electronics, furniture and home goods to offer flexible payment plans for customers to obtain needed products.
Neuronetics is a Malvern, PA based, publicly traded company incorporated in Delaware in April 2003, that develops non-invasive treatments for psychiatric disorders that have shown resistance or lack of improvement using traditional medicine. The treatments are based upon neuromodulation technology.
KPLT vs STIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $73.9M | $41.8M |
| Net Profit | $19.8M | $-7.2M |
| Gross Margin | 15.6% | 52.0% |
| Operating Margin | -1.4% | -12.1% |
| Net Margin | 26.8% | -17.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.3% | 85.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 307.3% | 43.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.69 | $-0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $73.9M | $41.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.0M | $37.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.9M | $38.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.9M | $32.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $63.0M | $22.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.3M | $18.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.9M | $16.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $65.1M | $17.4M |
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.8M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.7M | $-12.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.6M | $-12.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.9M | $-13.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.9M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-570.0K | $-7.9M |
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | 52.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.7% | 45.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | 46.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 49.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.8% | 66.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.8% | 75.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.9% | 74.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.3% | 75.1% |
| Q4 25 | -1.4% | -12.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | -19.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.0% | -21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.7% | -34.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.7% | -51.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.4% | -41.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.5% | -51.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.8% | -39.4% |
| Q4 25 | 26.8% | -17.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.7% | -24.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.9% | -26.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.9% | -39.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -15.2% | -56.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.7% | -72.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.7% | -59.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.9% | -45.2% |
| Q4 25 | $3.69 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.94 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.63 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.23 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.17 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.05 | $-0.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.61 | $-0.33 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.13 | $-0.27 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $22.4M | $28.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $65.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-38.1M | $22.4M |
| Total Assets | $107.9M | $141.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 2.94× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $22.4M | $28.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4M | $28.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7M | $11.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0M | $20.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5M | $18.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9M | $20.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.7M | $42.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.2M | $47.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $65.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $65.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $55.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $55.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $55.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $46.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $59.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $59.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-38.1M | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-58.4M | $27.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-54.1M | $27.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-51.7M | $35.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-46.8M | $27.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-40.3M | $9.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-32.9M | $19.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-27.5M | $27.7M |
| Q4 25 | $107.9M | $141.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.9M | $145.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $90.6M | $134.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.5M | $142.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.2M | $140.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $106.6M | $96.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $106.6M | $103.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.94× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.40× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.08× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.15× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-11.9M | $908.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.0M | $692.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -16.2% | 1.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.60× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-21.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $908.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $-785.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.6M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4M | $-17.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-32.6M | $-8.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.4M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-628.0K | $-5.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0M | $-12.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.0M | $692.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $-899.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4M | $-17.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-32.6M | $-8.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.4M | $-5.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-653.0K | $-5.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-12.4M |
| Q4 25 | -16.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | -2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -9.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | -53.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -51.8% | -38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -9.0% | -31.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.1% | -34.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -71.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 2.2% |
| Q4 25 | -0.60× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
