vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Kroger (KR) and Micron Technology (MU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kroger is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($33.9B vs $23.9B, roughly 1.4× Micron Technology). Micron Technology runs the higher net margin — 57.8% vs -3.9%, a 61.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Micron Technology posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (196.3% vs 0.7%).
The Kroger Co., or simply Kroger, is an American retail corporation headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio. It operates supermarkets and multi-department stores throughout the United States.
Micron Technology, Inc. is an American producer of computer memory and computer data storage including dynamic random-access memory, flash memory, and solid-state drives (SSDs). It is headquartered in Boise, Idaho.
KR vs MU — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $33.9B | $23.9B |
| Net Profit | $-1.3B | $13.8B |
| Gross Margin | — | 74.4% |
| Operating Margin | -4.6% | 67.6% |
| Net Margin | -3.9% | 57.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.7% | 196.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -313.6% | 770.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.02 | $12.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 26 | — | $23.9B | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $23.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $33.9B | $13.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.9B | $11.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.1B | $9.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.3B | $8.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.8B |
| Q2 26 | — | $13.8B | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $13.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.3B | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $609.0M | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $866.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $634.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q2 26 | — | 74.4% | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 74.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 56.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 44.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 35.3% |
| Q2 26 | — | 67.6% | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 67.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | -4.6% | 45.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 32.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 23.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 22.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q2 26 | — | 57.8% | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 57.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.9% | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 28.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 19.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q2 26 | — | $12.07 | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $12.07 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.02 | $4.60 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.91 | $2.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.29 | $1.68 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.90 | $1.41 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.67 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.0B | $14.6B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $16.0B | $9.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.0B | $72.5B |
| Total Assets | $51.4B | $101.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.27× | 0.13× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | — | $14.6B | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $13.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.9B | $9.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $10.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $7.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.0B |
| Q2 26 | — | $9.6B | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $9.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.0B | $11.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.9B | $14.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.9B | $15.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.9B | $13.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $13.0B |
| Q2 26 | — | $72.5B | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $72.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0B | $58.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.3B | $54.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.9B | $50.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3B | $48.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $46.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $45.1B |
| Q2 26 | — | $101.5B | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $101.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $51.4B | $86.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $53.6B | $82.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.2B | $78.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $52.6B | $73.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $71.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $69.4B |
| Q2 26 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.27× | 0.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | 0.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.79× | 0.30× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.92× | 0.28× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.29× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $970.0M | $20.3B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $29.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.8% | 21.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.47× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.3B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | — | $20.3B | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $11.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $970.0M | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $17.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.5B |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $29.0M | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $615.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $520.0M | $-113.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $38.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $121.0M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 23.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 22.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 14.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | -1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.6% |
| Q2 26 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 26.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.8% | 39.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 140.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.6% | 50.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 108.2% |
| Q2 26 | — | 1.47× | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.53× | 5.47× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.48× | 2.45× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.21× | 2.49× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.