vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Kroger (KR) and T-Mobile US (TMUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kroger is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($33.9B vs $23.1B, roughly 1.5× T-Mobile US). T-Mobile US runs the higher net margin — 10.8% vs -3.9%, a 14.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, T-Mobile US posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.6% vs 0.7%).
The Kroger Co., or simply Kroger, is an American retail corporation headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio. It operates supermarkets and multi-department stores throughout the United States.
T-Mobile US, Inc. is an American wireless network operator headquartered in Bellevue, Washington. Its majority shareholder and namesake is the German telecommunications company Deutsche Telekom. T-Mobile is the second largest wireless carrier in the United States, with 140 million subscribers as of September 30, 2025.
KR vs TMUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $33.9B | $23.1B |
| Net Profit | $-1.3B | $2.5B |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -4.6% | 20.8% |
| Net Margin | -3.9% | 10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.7% | 10.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -313.6% | -15.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.02 | $2.27 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $23.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $33.9B | $24.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.9B | $22.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.1B | $21.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.3B | $20.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $21.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $20.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $19.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $609.0M | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $866.0M | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $634.0M | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | -4.6% | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 23.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.9% | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 15.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 14.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.27 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.02 | $1.89 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.91 | $2.41 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.29 | $2.84 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.90 | $2.58 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.56 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.61 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.49 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.0B | $3.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $16.0B | $86.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.0B | $55.9B |
| Total Assets | $51.4B | $214.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.27× | 1.54× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $5.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.9B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $10.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $12.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $86.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.0B | $86.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $78.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $55.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0B | $59.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.3B | $60.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.9B | $61.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3B | $61.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $61.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $64.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $62.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $214.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $51.4B | $219.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $53.6B | $217.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.2B | $212.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $52.6B | $214.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $208.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $210.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $208.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.54× | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.27× | 1.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.79× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.92× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $970.0M | $7.2B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $29.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.8% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.88× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.3B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $970.0M | $6.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $7.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $7.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $29.0M | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $615.0M | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $520.0M | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 17.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 21.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 21.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 21.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.8% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.6% | 11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.88× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.16× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.53× | 2.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.48× | 2.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.21× | 2.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.86× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.89× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KR
Segment breakdown not available.
TMUS
| Postpaid service revenues | $15.6B | 68% |
| Other | $7.5B | 32% |
