vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KRONOS WORLDWIDE INC (KRO) and TIC Solutions, Inc. (TIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TIC Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($508.3M vs $418.3M, roughly 1.2× KRONOS WORLDWIDE INC). TIC Solutions, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -9.3% vs -19.8%, a 10.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. KRONOS WORLDWIDE INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($81.9M vs $37.1M).
Kronos Incorporated was an American multinational workforce management and human capital management cloud provider headquartered in Lowell, Massachusetts, United States, which employed more than 6,000 people worldwide.
KRO vs TIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $418.3M | $508.3M |
| Net Profit | $-82.8M | $-47.2M |
| Gross Margin | -0.9% | 35.2% |
| Operating Margin | -15.1% | -3.8% |
| Net Margin | -19.8% | -9.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.1% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -527.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.72 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $418.3M | $508.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $456.9M | $473.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $494.4M | $313.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $489.8M | $234.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $423.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $484.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $500.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $478.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-82.8M | $-47.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-37.0M | $-13.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.2M | $-233.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.1M | $-25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $71.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.9% | 35.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.3% | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.7% | 23.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.8% | 18.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -15.1% | -3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.2% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | -4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -19.8% | -9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.1% | -2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.9% | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | -11.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.72 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.32 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.08 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.62 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.17 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $33.2M | $439.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $557.4M | $1.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $751.1M | $2.2B |
| Total Assets | $1.8B | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.74× | 0.74× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $33.2M | $439.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.7M | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.9M | $130.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.5M | $155.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $94.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $120.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $557.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $626.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $589.3M | $751.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $557.2M | $752.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $507.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $554.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $423.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $426.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $751.1M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $804.7M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $846.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $847.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $817.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $847.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $774.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $774.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.74× | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.78× | 0.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.70× | 0.64× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | 0.67× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.55× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $92.1M | $49.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $81.9M | $37.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.6% | 7.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.4% | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-40.4M | $61.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $92.1M | $49.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.9M | $19.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.7M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-102.4M | $32.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-43.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $81.9M | $37.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-17.4M | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.5M | $-14.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-114.4M | $28.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-48.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 19.6% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.8% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -23.4% | 12.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.4% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.66× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.96× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.35× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KRO
Segment breakdown not available.
TIC
| Consulting Engineering Segment | $300.1M | 59% |
| Geospatial Segment | $131.3M | 26% |
| Fixed Unit Price Contracts | $54.3M | 11% |
| Other | $22.6M | 4% |