vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) and NLIGHT, INC. (LASR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($82.5M vs $81.2M, roughly 1.0× NLIGHT, INC.). Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP runs the higher net margin — 30.1% vs -6.0%, a 36.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NLIGHT, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (71.3% vs 23.6%). Over the past eight quarters, NLIGHT, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (35.0% CAGR vs 0.1%).

Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP is a publicly traded US limited partnership focused on owning and acquiring mineral and royalty interests in oil and gas properties across key domestic producing basins including the Permian, Bakken, and Eagle Ford. Its core revenue comes from production-linked royalty payments from its diversified onshore hydrocarbon asset portfolio.

nLight Inc. is a global developer and manufacturer of high-performance semiconductor lasers, fiber lasers, and related optical components. Its products serve key segments including industrial precision manufacturing, aerospace and defense, medical equipment, and advanced research, with customers across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific.

KRP vs LASR — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KRP
KRP
1.0× larger
KRP
$82.5M
$81.2M
LASR
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
LASR
LASR
+47.8% gap
LASR
71.3%
23.6%
KRP
Higher net margin
KRP
KRP
36.1% more per $
KRP
30.1%
-6.0%
LASR
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
LASR
LASR
Annualised
LASR
35.0%
0.1%
KRP

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
KRP
KRP
LASR
LASR
Revenue
$82.5M
$81.2M
Net Profit
$24.8M
$-4.9M
Gross Margin
30.7%
Operating Margin
39.6%
-6.7%
Net Margin
30.1%
-6.0%
Revenue YoY
23.6%
71.3%
Net Profit YoY
163.2%
80.3%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.10

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KRP
KRP
LASR
LASR
Q4 25
$82.5M
$81.2M
Q3 25
$80.6M
$66.7M
Q2 25
$86.5M
$61.7M
Q1 25
$84.2M
$51.7M
Q4 24
$66.7M
$47.4M
Q3 24
$83.8M
$56.1M
Q2 24
$76.6M
$50.5M
Q1 24
$82.2M
$44.5M
Net Profit
KRP
KRP
LASR
LASR
Q4 25
$24.8M
$-4.9M
Q3 25
$22.3M
$-6.9M
Q2 25
$26.7M
$-3.6M
Q1 25
$25.9M
$-8.1M
Q4 24
$-39.3M
$-25.0M
Q3 24
$25.8M
$-10.3M
Q2 24
$15.2M
$-11.7M
Q1 24
$9.3M
$-13.8M
Gross Margin
KRP
KRP
LASR
LASR
Q4 25
30.7%
Q3 25
31.1%
Q2 25
29.9%
Q1 25
26.7%
Q4 24
2.4%
Q3 24
22.4%
Q2 24
23.5%
Q1 24
16.8%
Operating Margin
KRP
KRP
LASR
LASR
Q4 25
39.6%
-6.7%
Q3 25
35.8%
-10.9%
Q2 25
43.7%
-6.9%
Q1 25
39.9%
-18.6%
Q4 24
-58.0%
-55.8%
Q3 24
40.8%
-21.0%
Q2 24
31.2%
-25.1%
Q1 24
21.4%
-33.1%
Net Margin
KRP
KRP
LASR
LASR
Q4 25
30.1%
-6.0%
Q3 25
27.7%
-10.3%
Q2 25
30.8%
-5.8%
Q1 25
30.7%
-15.7%
Q4 24
-58.8%
-52.7%
Q3 24
30.8%
-18.4%
Q2 24
19.8%
-23.2%
Q1 24
11.4%
-30.9%
EPS (diluted)
KRP
KRP
LASR
LASR
Q4 25
$-0.10
Q3 25
$-0.14
Q2 25
$-0.07
Q1 25
$-0.16
Q4 24
$-0.52
Q3 24
$-0.21
Q2 24
$-0.25
Q1 24
$-0.29

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KRP
KRP
LASR
LASR
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$44.0M
$98.7M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$226.7M
Total Assets
$1.2B
$315.2M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KRP
KRP
LASR
LASR
Q4 25
$44.0M
$98.7M
Q3 25
$40.0M
$81.1M
Q2 25
$34.5M
$78.8M
Q1 25
$35.6M
$82.2M
Q4 24
$34.2M
$65.8M
Q3 24
$34.7M
$41.5M
Q2 24
$30.9M
$49.4M
Q1 24
$39.7M
$61.3M
Stockholders' Equity
KRP
KRP
LASR
LASR
Q4 25
$226.7M
Q3 25
$218.5M
Q2 25
$216.0M
Q1 25
$212.8M
Q4 24
$216.4M
Q3 24
$235.3M
Q2 24
$239.5M
Q1 24
$244.4M
Total Assets
KRP
KRP
LASR
LASR
Q4 25
$1.2B
$315.2M
Q3 25
$1.3B
$298.7M
Q2 25
$1.3B
$295.3M
Q1 25
$1.3B
$290.0M
Q4 24
$1.1B
$270.2M
Q3 24
$1.2B
$291.3M
Q2 24
$1.2B
$294.3M
Q1 24
$1.3B
$302.8M

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KRP
KRP
LASR
LASR
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$57.2M
$17.5M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$15.9M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
19.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.31×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$12.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KRP
KRP
LASR
LASR
Q4 25
$57.2M
$17.5M
Q3 25
$62.8M
$5.2M
Q2 25
$72.3M
$-1.4M
Q1 25
$54.2M
$-20.0K
Q4 24
$56.6M
$-3.9M
Q3 24
$62.4M
$-5.6M
Q2 24
$62.9M
$-4.2M
Q1 24
$69.0M
$11.4M
Free Cash Flow
KRP
KRP
LASR
LASR
Q4 25
$15.9M
Q3 25
$2.4M
Q2 25
$-3.8M
Q1 25
$-2.3M
Q4 24
$-6.5M
Q3 24
$-7.2M
Q2 24
$-6.4M
Q1 24
$9.8M
FCF Margin
KRP
KRP
LASR
LASR
Q4 25
19.6%
Q3 25
3.7%
Q2 25
-6.1%
Q1 25
-4.5%
Q4 24
-13.7%
Q3 24
-12.9%
Q2 24
-12.6%
Q1 24
22.1%
Capex Intensity
KRP
KRP
LASR
LASR
Q4 25
2.0%
Q3 25
4.2%
Q2 25
3.9%
Q1 25
4.4%
Q4 24
5.5%
Q3 24
2.9%
Q2 24
4.2%
Q1 24
3.5%
Cash Conversion
KRP
KRP
LASR
LASR
Q4 25
2.31×
Q3 25
2.81×
Q2 25
2.71×
Q1 25
2.09×
Q4 24
Q3 24
2.42×
Q2 24
4.14×
Q1 24
7.39×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KRP
KRP

Oil And Condensate$45.9M56%
Natural Gas Midstream$19.5M24%
NGL Revenue$10.6M13%
Other$6.4M8%

LASR
LASR

Aerospaceand Defense$56.3M69%
Microfabrication$14.2M18%
Industrial$10.7M13%

Related Comparisons