vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) and Mastech Digital, Inc. (MHH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($82.5M vs $45.5M, roughly 1.8× Mastech Digital, Inc.). Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP runs the higher net margin — 30.1% vs 2.1%, a 27.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.6% vs -10.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP's revenue compounded faster (0.1% CAGR vs -1.5%).

Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP is a publicly traded US limited partnership focused on owning and acquiring mineral and royalty interests in oil and gas properties across key domestic producing basins including the Permian, Bakken, and Eagle Ford. Its core revenue comes from production-linked royalty payments from its diversified onshore hydrocarbon asset portfolio.

Mastech Digital, Inc. is a digital transformation and information technology (IT) services company headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, providing services to corporations across North America, Middle East, Asian, and Japan.

KRP vs MHH — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KRP
KRP
1.8× larger
KRP
$82.5M
$45.5M
MHH
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
KRP
KRP
+34.0% gap
KRP
23.6%
-10.4%
MHH
Higher net margin
KRP
KRP
27.9% more per $
KRP
30.1%
2.1%
MHH
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
KRP
KRP
Annualised
KRP
0.1%
-1.5%
MHH

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
KRP
KRP
MHH
MHH
Revenue
$82.5M
$45.5M
Net Profit
$24.8M
$972.0K
Gross Margin
28.3%
Operating Margin
39.6%
2.2%
Net Margin
30.1%
2.1%
Revenue YoY
23.6%
-10.4%
Net Profit YoY
163.2%
227.3%
EPS (diluted)
$0.08

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KRP
KRP
MHH
MHH
Q4 25
$82.5M
$45.5M
Q3 25
$80.6M
$48.5M
Q2 25
$86.5M
$49.1M
Q1 25
$84.2M
$48.3M
Q4 24
$66.7M
$50.7M
Q3 24
$83.8M
$51.8M
Q2 24
$76.6M
$49.5M
Q1 24
$82.2M
$46.8M
Net Profit
KRP
KRP
MHH
MHH
Q4 25
$24.8M
$972.0K
Q3 25
$22.3M
$941.0K
Q2 25
$26.7M
$135.0K
Q1 25
$25.9M
$-1.4M
Q4 24
$-39.3M
$297.0K
Q3 24
$25.8M
$1.9M
Q2 24
$15.2M
$1.4M
Q1 24
$9.3M
$-161.0K
Gross Margin
KRP
KRP
MHH
MHH
Q4 25
28.3%
Q3 25
27.8%
Q2 25
28.1%
Q1 25
26.7%
Q4 24
29.0%
Q3 24
28.5%
Q2 24
28.2%
Q1 24
25.9%
Operating Margin
KRP
KRP
MHH
MHH
Q4 25
39.6%
2.2%
Q3 25
35.8%
1.7%
Q2 25
43.7%
0.1%
Q1 25
39.9%
-3.8%
Q4 24
-58.0%
0.1%
Q3 24
40.8%
4.7%
Q2 24
31.2%
3.4%
Q1 24
21.4%
-0.9%
Net Margin
KRP
KRP
MHH
MHH
Q4 25
30.1%
2.1%
Q3 25
27.7%
1.9%
Q2 25
30.8%
0.3%
Q1 25
30.7%
-3.0%
Q4 24
-58.8%
0.6%
Q3 24
30.8%
3.6%
Q2 24
19.8%
2.8%
Q1 24
11.4%
-0.3%
EPS (diluted)
KRP
KRP
MHH
MHH
Q4 25
$0.08
Q3 25
$0.08
Q2 25
$0.01
Q1 25
$-0.12
Q4 24
$0.01
Q3 24
$0.16
Q2 24
$0.12
Q1 24
$-0.01

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KRP
KRP
MHH
MHH
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$44.0M
$36.5M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$89.3M
Total Assets
$1.2B
$111.8M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KRP
KRP
MHH
MHH
Q4 25
$44.0M
$36.5M
Q3 25
$40.0M
$32.7M
Q2 25
$34.5M
$27.9M
Q1 25
$35.6M
$24.7M
Q4 24
$34.2M
$27.7M
Q3 24
$34.7M
$23.9M
Q2 24
$30.9M
$20.6M
Q1 24
$39.7M
$19.4M
Stockholders' Equity
KRP
KRP
MHH
MHH
Q4 25
$89.3M
Q3 25
$88.0M
Q2 25
$87.8M
Q1 25
$86.9M
Q4 24
$87.4M
Q3 24
$86.5M
Q2 24
$84.0M
Q1 24
$81.7M
Total Assets
KRP
KRP
MHH
MHH
Q4 25
$1.2B
$111.8M
Q3 25
$1.3B
$112.6M
Q2 25
$1.3B
$110.4M
Q1 25
$1.3B
$110.1M
Q4 24
$1.1B
$111.5M
Q3 24
$1.2B
$111.5M
Q2 24
$1.2B
$107.5M
Q1 24
$1.3B
$106.1M

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KRP
KRP
MHH
MHH
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$57.2M
$4.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$4.3M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
9.5%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.31×
4.48×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$10.8M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KRP
KRP
MHH
MHH
Q4 25
$57.2M
$4.4M
Q3 25
$62.8M
$6.5M
Q2 25
$72.3M
$3.3M
Q1 25
$54.2M
$-3.0M
Q4 24
$56.6M
$4.0M
Q3 24
$62.4M
$3.3M
Q2 24
$62.9M
$1.2M
Q1 24
$69.0M
$-1.3M
Free Cash Flow
KRP
KRP
MHH
MHH
Q4 25
$4.3M
Q3 25
$6.3M
Q2 25
$3.2M
Q1 25
$-3.1M
Q4 24
$3.9M
Q3 24
$3.2M
Q2 24
$707.0K
Q1 24
$-1.6M
FCF Margin
KRP
KRP
MHH
MHH
Q4 25
9.5%
Q3 25
13.0%
Q2 25
6.6%
Q1 25
-6.4%
Q4 24
7.7%
Q3 24
6.2%
Q2 24
1.4%
Q1 24
-3.4%
Capex Intensity
KRP
KRP
MHH
MHH
Q4 25
0.1%
Q3 25
0.4%
Q2 25
0.1%
Q1 25
0.2%
Q4 24
0.2%
Q3 24
0.1%
Q2 24
1.0%
Q1 24
0.6%
Cash Conversion
KRP
KRP
MHH
MHH
Q4 25
2.31×
4.48×
Q3 25
2.81×
6.88×
Q2 25
2.71×
24.41×
Q1 25
2.09×
Q4 24
13.60×
Q3 24
2.42×
1.76×
Q2 24
4.14×
0.85×
Q1 24
7.39×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KRP
KRP

Oil And Condensate$45.9M56%
Natural Gas Midstream$19.5M24%
NGL Revenue$10.6M13%
Other$6.4M8%

MHH
MHH

IT Staffing Services$37.6M83%
Data And Analytics Services$7.8M17%

Related Comparisons