vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) and Proto Labs Inc (PRLB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Proto Labs Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($139.3M vs $82.5M, roughly 1.7× Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP). Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP runs the higher net margin — 30.1% vs 5.8%, a 24.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.6% vs 10.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Proto Labs Inc's revenue compounded faster (5.3% CAGR vs 0.1%).

Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP is a publicly traded US limited partnership focused on owning and acquiring mineral and royalty interests in oil and gas properties across key domestic producing basins including the Permian, Bakken, and Eagle Ford. Its core revenue comes from production-linked royalty payments from its diversified onshore hydrocarbon asset portfolio.

Protolabs is a company that provides rapid manufacturing of 3D printed, CNC-machined, sheet metal, and injection-molded custom parts for prototyping and production. Markets like medical devices, aerospace, electronics, appliances, automotive and consumer products use these parts. Protolabs' headquarters are located in Maple Plain, Minnesota, with Minnesota-based manufacturing facilities in Plymouth, Brooklyn Park, and Rosemount, along with additional facilities in Nashua, New Hampshire and Ca...

KRP vs PRLB — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
PRLB
PRLB
1.7× larger
PRLB
$139.3M
$82.5M
KRP
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
KRP
KRP
+13.2% gap
KRP
23.6%
10.4%
PRLB
Higher net margin
KRP
KRP
24.3% more per $
KRP
30.1%
5.8%
PRLB
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
PRLB
PRLB
Annualised
PRLB
5.3%
0.1%
KRP

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
KRP
KRP
PRLB
PRLB
Revenue
$82.5M
$139.3M
Net Profit
$24.8M
$8.1M
Gross Margin
45.6%
Operating Margin
39.6%
7.1%
Net Margin
30.1%
5.8%
Revenue YoY
23.6%
10.4%
Net Profit YoY
163.2%
125.4%
EPS (diluted)
$0.29

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KRP
KRP
PRLB
PRLB
Q1 26
$139.3M
Q4 25
$82.5M
$136.5M
Q3 25
$80.6M
$135.4M
Q2 25
$86.5M
$135.1M
Q1 25
$84.2M
$126.2M
Q4 24
$66.7M
$121.8M
Q3 24
$83.8M
$125.6M
Q2 24
$76.6M
$125.6M
Net Profit
KRP
KRP
PRLB
PRLB
Q1 26
$8.1M
Q4 25
$24.8M
Q3 25
$22.3M
$7.2M
Q2 25
$26.7M
$4.4M
Q1 25
$25.9M
$3.6M
Q4 24
$-39.3M
Q3 24
$25.8M
$7.2M
Q2 24
$15.2M
$4.5M
Gross Margin
KRP
KRP
PRLB
PRLB
Q1 26
45.6%
Q4 25
44.2%
Q3 25
45.3%
Q2 25
44.3%
Q1 25
44.1%
Q4 24
42.7%
Q3 24
45.6%
Q2 24
45.0%
Operating Margin
KRP
KRP
PRLB
PRLB
Q1 26
7.1%
Q4 25
39.6%
5.0%
Q3 25
35.8%
6.5%
Q2 25
43.7%
3.7%
Q1 25
39.9%
3.6%
Q4 24
-58.0%
-1.2%
Q3 24
40.8%
6.8%
Q2 24
31.2%
4.8%
Net Margin
KRP
KRP
PRLB
PRLB
Q1 26
5.8%
Q4 25
30.1%
Q3 25
27.7%
5.3%
Q2 25
30.8%
3.3%
Q1 25
30.7%
2.9%
Q4 24
-58.8%
Q3 24
30.8%
5.7%
Q2 24
19.8%
3.6%
EPS (diluted)
KRP
KRP
PRLB
PRLB
Q1 26
$0.29
Q4 25
$0.25
Q3 25
$0.30
Q2 25
$0.18
Q1 25
$0.15
Q4 24
$-0.01
Q3 24
$0.29
Q2 24
$0.18

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KRP
KRP
PRLB
PRLB
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$44.0M
$124.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$683.1M
Total Assets
$1.2B
$778.6M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KRP
KRP
PRLB
PRLB
Q1 26
$124.0M
Q4 25
$44.0M
$128.1M
Q3 25
$40.0M
$119.2M
Q2 25
$34.5M
$103.2M
Q1 25
$35.6M
$96.8M
Q4 24
$34.2M
$103.1M
Q3 24
$34.7M
$100.5M
Q2 24
$30.9M
$112.9M
Stockholders' Equity
KRP
KRP
PRLB
PRLB
Q1 26
$683.1M
Q4 25
$673.9M
Q3 25
$664.7M
Q2 25
$664.7M
Q1 25
$656.8M
Q4 24
$670.2M
Q3 24
$680.0M
Q2 24
$685.2M
Total Assets
KRP
KRP
PRLB
PRLB
Q1 26
$778.6M
Q4 25
$1.2B
$763.4M
Q3 25
$1.3B
$756.9M
Q2 25
$1.3B
$743.3M
Q1 25
$1.3B
$737.5M
Q4 24
$1.1B
$743.5M
Q3 24
$1.2B
$753.8M
Q2 24
$1.2B
$758.2M

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KRP
KRP
PRLB
PRLB
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$57.2M
$17.5M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.31×
2.16×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KRP
KRP
PRLB
PRLB
Q1 26
$17.5M
Q4 25
$57.2M
$16.5M
Q3 25
$62.8M
$29.1M
Q2 25
$72.3M
$10.6M
Q1 25
$54.2M
$18.4M
Q4 24
$56.6M
$17.3M
Q3 24
$62.4M
$24.8M
Q2 24
$62.9M
$14.4M
Free Cash Flow
KRP
KRP
PRLB
PRLB
Q1 26
Q4 25
$8.4M
Q3 25
$25.0M
Q2 25
$9.1M
Q1 25
$17.1M
Q4 24
$16.5M
Q3 24
$23.2M
Q2 24
$10.2M
FCF Margin
KRP
KRP
PRLB
PRLB
Q1 26
Q4 25
6.2%
Q3 25
18.5%
Q2 25
6.7%
Q1 25
13.6%
Q4 24
13.5%
Q3 24
18.5%
Q2 24
8.2%
Capex Intensity
KRP
KRP
PRLB
PRLB
Q1 26
Q4 25
5.9%
Q3 25
3.0%
Q2 25
1.1%
Q1 25
1.0%
Q4 24
0.7%
Q3 24
1.2%
Q2 24
3.3%
Cash Conversion
KRP
KRP
PRLB
PRLB
Q1 26
2.16×
Q4 25
2.31×
Q3 25
2.81×
4.03×
Q2 25
2.71×
2.39×
Q1 25
2.09×
5.11×
Q4 24
Q3 24
2.42×
3.44×
Q2 24
4.14×
3.18×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KRP
KRP

Oil And Condensate$45.9M56%
Natural Gas Midstream$19.5M24%
NGL Revenue$10.6M13%
Other$6.4M8%

PRLB
PRLB

CNC Machining$63.2M45%
Injection Molding$51.1M37%
3D Printing$20.5M15%
Sheet Metal$4.4M3%
Other Revenue$207.0K0%

Related Comparisons