vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) and Turning Point Brands, Inc. (TPB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Turning Point Brands, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($121.0M vs $82.5M, roughly 1.5× Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP). Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP runs the higher net margin — 30.1% vs 6.8%, a 23.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Turning Point Brands, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (29.2% vs 23.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Turning Point Brands, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (20.7% CAGR vs 0.1%).

Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP is a publicly traded US limited partnership focused on owning and acquiring mineral and royalty interests in oil and gas properties across key domestic producing basins including the Permian, Bakken, and Eagle Ford. Its core revenue comes from production-linked royalty payments from its diversified onshore hydrocarbon asset portfolio.

Turning Point Australia (TPAUS) is a conservative lobby group based in Australia, affiliated with Turning Point USA but independent of it. Founded by Joel Jammal and first registered in 2023, the group has become active in trying to influence the outcome of the 2026 South Australian state election in March 2026.

KRP vs TPB — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
TPB
TPB
1.5× larger
TPB
$121.0M
$82.5M
KRP
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
TPB
TPB
+5.6% gap
TPB
29.2%
23.6%
KRP
Higher net margin
KRP
KRP
23.3% more per $
KRP
30.1%
6.8%
TPB
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
TPB
TPB
Annualised
TPB
20.7%
0.1%
KRP

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
KRP
KRP
TPB
TPB
Revenue
$82.5M
$121.0M
Net Profit
$24.8M
$8.2M
Gross Margin
55.9%
Operating Margin
39.6%
16.5%
Net Margin
30.1%
6.8%
Revenue YoY
23.6%
29.2%
Net Profit YoY
163.2%
239.8%
EPS (diluted)
$0.40

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KRP
KRP
TPB
TPB
Q4 25
$82.5M
$121.0M
Q3 25
$80.6M
$119.0M
Q2 25
$86.5M
$116.6M
Q1 25
$84.2M
$106.4M
Q4 24
$66.7M
$93.7M
Q3 24
$83.8M
$90.7M
Q2 24
$76.6M
$93.2M
Q1 24
$82.2M
$83.1M
Net Profit
KRP
KRP
TPB
TPB
Q4 25
$24.8M
$8.2M
Q3 25
$22.3M
$21.1M
Q2 25
$26.7M
$14.5M
Q1 25
$25.9M
$14.4M
Q4 24
$-39.3M
$2.4M
Q3 24
$25.8M
$12.4M
Q2 24
$15.2M
$13.0M
Q1 24
$9.3M
$12.0M
Gross Margin
KRP
KRP
TPB
TPB
Q4 25
55.9%
Q3 25
59.2%
Q2 25
57.1%
Q1 25
56.0%
Q4 24
56.0%
Q3 24
55.6%
Q2 24
54.1%
Q1 24
58.2%
Operating Margin
KRP
KRP
TPB
TPB
Q4 25
39.6%
16.5%
Q3 25
35.8%
21.8%
Q2 25
43.7%
22.6%
Q1 25
39.9%
21.8%
Q4 24
-58.0%
19.1%
Q3 24
40.8%
22.9%
Q2 24
31.2%
24.5%
Q1 24
21.4%
23.2%
Net Margin
KRP
KRP
TPB
TPB
Q4 25
30.1%
6.8%
Q3 25
27.7%
17.7%
Q2 25
30.8%
12.4%
Q1 25
30.7%
13.5%
Q4 24
-58.8%
2.6%
Q3 24
30.8%
13.6%
Q2 24
19.8%
14.0%
Q1 24
11.4%
14.5%
EPS (diluted)
KRP
KRP
TPB
TPB
Q4 25
$0.40
Q3 25
$1.13
Q2 25
$0.79
Q1 25
$0.79
Q4 24
$0.15
Q3 24
$0.68
Q2 24
$0.68
Q1 24
$0.63

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KRP
KRP
TPB
TPB
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$44.0M
$222.8M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$372.0M
Total Assets
$1.2B
$763.8M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KRP
KRP
TPB
TPB
Q4 25
$44.0M
$222.8M
Q3 25
$40.0M
$201.2M
Q2 25
$34.5M
$109.9M
Q1 25
$35.6M
$99.6M
Q4 24
$34.2M
$48.9M
Q3 24
$34.7M
$33.6M
Q2 24
$30.9M
$142.2M
Q1 24
$39.7M
$130.9M
Stockholders' Equity
KRP
KRP
TPB
TPB
Q4 25
$372.0M
Q3 25
$358.2M
Q2 25
$224.8M
Q1 25
$203.4M
Q4 24
$190.4M
Q3 24
$185.7M
Q2 24
$172.8M
Q1 24
$160.0M
Total Assets
KRP
KRP
TPB
TPB
Q4 25
$1.2B
$763.8M
Q3 25
$1.3B
$742.8M
Q2 25
$1.3B
$595.8M
Q1 25
$1.3B
$564.6M
Q4 24
$1.1B
$493.4M
Q3 24
$1.2B
$488.0M
Q2 24
$1.2B
$591.6M
Q1 24
$1.3B
$586.3M

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KRP
KRP
TPB
TPB
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$57.2M
$24.9M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$21.5M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
17.8%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.31×
3.03×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$43.8M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KRP
KRP
TPB
TPB
Q4 25
$57.2M
$24.9M
Q3 25
$62.8M
$3.3M
Q2 25
$72.3M
$11.8M
Q1 25
$54.2M
$17.4M
Q4 24
$56.6M
$17.7M
Q3 24
$62.4M
$13.2M
Q2 24
$62.9M
$13.4M
Q1 24
$69.0M
$22.6M
Free Cash Flow
KRP
KRP
TPB
TPB
Q4 25
$21.5M
Q3 25
$-721.0K
Q2 25
$7.8M
Q1 25
$15.2M
Q4 24
$16.6M
Q3 24
$12.6M
Q2 24
$10.9M
Q1 24
$22.3M
FCF Margin
KRP
KRP
TPB
TPB
Q4 25
17.8%
Q3 25
-0.6%
Q2 25
6.7%
Q1 25
14.3%
Q4 24
17.8%
Q3 24
13.9%
Q2 24
11.7%
Q1 24
26.8%
Capex Intensity
KRP
KRP
TPB
TPB
Q4 25
2.8%
Q3 25
3.4%
Q2 25
3.4%
Q1 25
2.1%
Q4 24
1.2%
Q3 24
0.7%
Q2 24
2.7%
Q1 24
0.4%
Cash Conversion
KRP
KRP
TPB
TPB
Q4 25
2.31×
3.03×
Q3 25
2.81×
0.16×
Q2 25
2.71×
0.82×
Q1 25
2.09×
1.21×
Q4 24
7.34×
Q3 24
2.42×
1.07×
Q2 24
4.14×
1.03×
Q1 24
7.39×
1.89×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KRP
KRP

Oil And Condensate$45.9M56%
Natural Gas Midstream$19.5M24%
NGL Revenue$10.6M13%
Other$6.4M8%

TPB
TPB

US$111.5M92%
Non Us$9.6M8%

Related Comparisons