vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Karat Packaging Inc. (KRT) and Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Karat Packaging Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($115.6M vs $100.0M, roughly 1.2× Latham Group, Inc.). Karat Packaging Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.9% vs -7.0%, a 12.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Latham Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.5% vs 13.7%). Karat Packaging Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($15.1M vs $14.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Karat Packaging Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (10.0% CAGR vs -4.9%).
Karat Packaging Inc. is a specialty manufacturer and distributor of disposable foodservice packaging products. Its offerings include paper and plastic cups, food containers, cutlery, lids, and custom branded solutions, serving restaurant chains, cafes, catering operators, and retail foodservice clients primarily across North America.
Latham & Watkins LLP is an American multinational law firm. Founded in 1934 in Los Angeles, California, it is known for its litigation, corporate, and regulatory law practices.
KRT vs SWIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $115.6M | $100.0M |
| Net Profit | $6.8M | $-7.0M |
| Gross Margin | 34.0% | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 7.3% | -10.7% |
| Net Margin | 5.9% | -7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.7% | 14.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 21.3% | 76.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.34 | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $115.6M | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $124.5M | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $124.0M | $172.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.6M | $111.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.6M | $87.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $112.8M | $150.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $112.6M | $160.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $95.6M | $110.6M |
| Q4 25 | $6.8M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.3M | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.9M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.4M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.6M | $-29.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.1M | $13.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.2M | $-7.9M |
| Q4 25 | 34.0% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.5% | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.6% | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.3% | 29.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.2% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.6% | 32.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.5% | 33.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 39.3% | 27.7% |
| Q4 25 | 7.3% | -10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.3% | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.5% | -4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | -14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.9% | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.4% | -1.9% |
| Q4 25 | 5.9% | -7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.2% | -5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | -33.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.1% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.1% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.4% | -7.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.34 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.36 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.54 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.32 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.28 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.45 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.45 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.31 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $37.9M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $279.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $149.4M | $405.9M |
| Total Assets | $287.7M | $823.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.69× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $37.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $59.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $46.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $279.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $281.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $281.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $306.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $281.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $282.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $282.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $282.8M |
| Q4 25 | $149.4M | $405.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $154.5M | $408.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $155.8M | $398.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $153.3M | $381.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $155.6M | $387.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $157.3M | $416.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $157.7M | $408.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $154.4M | $391.8M |
| Q4 25 | $287.7M | $823.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $302.8M | $844.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $321.0M | $822.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $312.2M | $824.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $294.5M | $794.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $306.8M | $853.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $310.7M | $830.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $279.0M | $808.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.72× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.4M | $23.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $15.1M | $14.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 13.1% | 14.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | 9.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.26× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $33.1M | $38.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.4M | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $982.0K | $51.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.8M | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.7M | $-46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.3M | $6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.5M | $37.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.7M | $52.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.6M | $-34.5M |
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | $14.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $736.0K | $45.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.6M | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.6M | $-50.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.0M | $-98.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.2M | $33.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.4M | $47.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.4M | $-39.9M |
| Q4 25 | 13.1% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 27.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.4% | -45.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.9% | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.0% | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.9% | 29.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.7% | -36.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | 2.26× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.13× | 6.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.89× | 2.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.21× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.14× | 6.32× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.50× | 3.95× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.06× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KRT
Segment breakdown not available.
SWIM
| In Ground Swimming Pools | $50.2M | 50% |
| Covers | $37.0M | 37% |
| Liners | $12.7M | 13% |
