vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Knightscope, Inc. (KSCP) and Rekor Systems, Inc. (REKR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Rekor Systems, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($12.7M vs $2.5M, roughly 5.0× Knightscope, Inc.). Rekor Systems, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -61.3% vs -435.4%, a 374.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Rekor Systems, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-4.4% vs -9.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Rekor Systems, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (14.0% CAGR vs 6.1%).
Knightscope, Inc.KSCPEarnings & Financial Report
Knightscope, Inc. is an American security camera and robotics company headquartered in Mountain View, California. Knightscope designs, builds and deploys robots called Autonomous Data Robots (ADRs) for use in monitoring people in malls, parking lots, neighborhoods and other public areas. Knightscope robots are fully autonomous using self-driving technology and are designed to alert police and security of incidents through sensors that detect weapons, read license plates and detect other suspi...
Rekor Systems, Inc. is a technology firm specializing in AI-powered intelligent transportation and public safety solutions. Its core offerings include automatic license plate recognition, traffic flow analytics, and road safety monitoring tools, serving municipal governments, transportation agencies and law enforcement entities primarily across North America.
KSCP vs REKR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.5M | $12.7M |
| Net Profit | $-11.1M | $-7.8M |
| Gross Margin | -63.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | -444.7% | -55.5% |
| Net Margin | -435.4% | -61.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.8% | -4.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -58.6% | 61.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.84 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.5M | $12.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1M | $14.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7M | $12.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $9.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5M | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2M | $12.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3M | $9.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-11.1M | $-7.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.5M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.3M | $-8.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.9M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.0M | $-20.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.9M | $-12.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.3M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.6M | $-18.6M |
| Q4 25 | -63.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -50.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -33.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -22.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -42.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -20.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -64.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -444.7% | -55.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -303.7% | -28.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -228.0% | -62.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -234.1% | -110.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -245.1% | -139.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -305.4% | -121.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -211.1% | -81.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -367.3% | -132.1% |
| Q4 25 | -435.4% | -61.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -304.7% | -29.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -230.2% | -70.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -236.4% | -118.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -247.7% | -153.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -430.1% | -119.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -195.8% | -78.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -336.8% | -190.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.84 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.98 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.90 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.28 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.72 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.58 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.68 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.99 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $20.6M | $16.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.0M | $15.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $27.8M | $42.9M |
| Total Assets | $41.3M | $85.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.14× | 0.35× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $20.6M | $16.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.4M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.2M | $4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.7M | $3.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1M | $5.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2M | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5M | $11.9M |
| Q4 25 | $4.0M | $15.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0M | $14.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0M | $15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0M | $15.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9M | $15.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $16.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $16.7M |
| Q4 25 | $27.8M | $42.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.9M | $36.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.1M | $35.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.2M | $33.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.8M | $34.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.3M | $40.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2M | $46.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-26.6M | $52.9M |
| Q4 25 | $41.3M | $85.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.1M | $81.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.2M | $80.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.8M | $79.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.2M | $82.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.9M | $101.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $97.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.0M | $106.7M |
| Q4 25 | 0.14× | 0.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.15× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.26× | 0.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.22× | 0.48× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.25× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.42× | 0.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.36× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.32× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-10.6M | $210.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-254.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -2.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-22.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-10.6M | $210.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.9M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.5M | $-7.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.4M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.1M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.7M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.0M | $-10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.6M | $-7.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-254.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.1M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-8.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.7M | $-10.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-10.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-8.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -258.7% | -44.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -64.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -91.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -43.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -187.1% | -94.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -83.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -82.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.4% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.6% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KSCP
Segment breakdown not available.
REKR
| Urban Mobility | $8.4M | 66% |
| Public Safety | $3.8M | 30% |
| Other | $529.0K | 4% |
