vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Kontoor Brands, Inc. (KTB) and Skyworks Solutions (SWKS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Skyworks Solutions is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($943.7M vs $613.3M, roughly 1.5× Kontoor Brands, Inc.). Kontoor Brands, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 15.1% vs 3.8%, a 11.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kontoor Brands, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (45.0% vs -1.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Skyworks Solutions's revenue compounded faster (2.1% CAGR vs -1.4%).
Kontoor Brands is an American clothing company. It was a spin off from the VF Corporation in May 2019, and markets clothing under the Lee, Wrangler and Helly Hansen brand names.
Skyworks Solutions, Inc. is an American semiconductor company headquartered in Irvine, California, United States. The company's shares are listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the ticker symbol SWKS and is a constituent of the S&P 500.
KTB vs SWKS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $613.3M | $943.7M |
| Net Profit | $92.4M | $35.6M |
| Gross Margin | 53.7% | 40.8% |
| Operating Margin | 14.7% | 4.5% |
| Net Margin | 15.1% | 3.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 45.0% | -1.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 116.0% | -48.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.65 | $0.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 26 | — | $943.7M | ||
| Q1 26 | $613.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $853.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $658.3M | $965.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $622.9M | $953.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $699.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $670.2M | $1.0B |
| Q2 26 | — | $35.6M | ||
| Q1 26 | $92.4M | $79.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $141.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.9M | $105.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.9M | $68.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.0M | $162.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $70.5M | $60.5M |
| Q2 26 | — | 40.8% | ||
| Q1 26 | 53.7% | 41.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 40.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.3% | 41.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.5% | 41.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.7% | 41.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.7% | 41.9% |
| Q2 26 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 26 | 14.7% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.8% | 10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.1% | 16.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.7% | 5.8% |
| Q2 26 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 26 | 15.1% | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 12.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | 10.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.5% | 5.9% |
| Q2 26 | — | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 26 | $1.65 | $0.53 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.95 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.66 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.32 | $0.70 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.76 | $0.43 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.13 | $1.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.26 | $0.36 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $56.4M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $618.9M | $5.8B |
| Total Assets | $2.7B | $7.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.85× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $56.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $356.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $334.1M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $269.4M | $1.6B |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | $496.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $496.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $496.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $735.6M | $995.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $740.3M | $994.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $745.0M | $994.3M |
| Q2 26 | — | $5.8B | ||
| Q1 26 | $618.9M | $5.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $529.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $498.3M | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $426.7M | $5.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $400.1M | $6.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $356.9M | $6.3B |
| Q2 26 | — | $7.9B | ||
| Q1 26 | $2.7B | $7.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $7.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $7.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $7.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $8.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $8.3B |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 1.85× | 0.09× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.53× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.74× | 0.09× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.72× | 0.17× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.85× | 0.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.09× | 0.16× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $50.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 8.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | — | $50.3M | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $395.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $200.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.7M | $314.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.6M | $409.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.0M | $377.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $133.6M | $476.1M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $339.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $144.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.4M | $252.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.9M | $370.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.0M | $338.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $129.9M | $393.3M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | 26.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.0% | 38.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.4% | 38.4% |
| Q2 26 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 8.1% |
| Q2 26 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 4.99× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.74× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | 2.99× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.81× | 5.96× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.28× | 2.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | 7.87× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KTB
| Wrangler U.S | $373.7M | 61% |
| Helly Hansen International | $129.3M | 21% |
| Wrangler International | $62.1M | 10% |
| Helly Hansen U.S | $36.2M | 6% |
| Global Other | $12.0M | 2% |
SWKS
Segment breakdown not available.
