vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Loews Corporation (L) and PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Loews Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($827.0M vs $651.6M, roughly 1.3× PROG Holdings, Inc.). Loews Corporation runs the higher net margin — 48.6% vs 5.5%, a 43.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PROG Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (457.1% vs 4.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Loews Corporation's revenue compounded faster (7.9% CAGR vs 4.9%).

Loews Corporation is a diversified US-based conglomerate that operates across multiple key industry segments through its subsidiaries. Its core business lines include property and casualty insurance, natural gas pipeline transportation, hospitality services, and upstream oil and gas exploration and production, primarily serving commercial, consumer and industrial clients across North American markets.

PROG Holdings, Inc. is a U.S.-based financial technology firm providing flexible lease-to-own and point-of-sale financing solutions to consumers. Operating primarily in the U.S. market, its core segments include retail partner financing, consumer lending, and payment services that help customers access electronics and household goods without traditional credit requirements.

L vs PRG — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
L
L
1.3× larger
L
$827.0M
$651.6M
PRG
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
PRG
PRG
+452.3% gap
PRG
457.1%
4.8%
L
Higher net margin
L
L
43.1% more per $
L
48.6%
5.5%
PRG
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
L
L
Annualised
L
7.9%
4.9%
PRG

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
L
L
PRG
PRG
Revenue
$827.0M
$651.6M
Net Profit
$402.0M
$36.1M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
65.4%
10.0%
Net Margin
48.6%
5.5%
Revenue YoY
4.8%
457.1%
Net Profit YoY
115.0%
3.8%
EPS (diluted)
$1.93
$3.68

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
L
L
PRG
PRG
Q1 26
$651.6M
Q4 25
$827.0M
$525.4M
Q3 25
$732.0M
$595.1M
Q2 25
$769.0M
$604.7M
Q1 25
$846.0M
$684.1M
Q4 24
$789.0M
$558.9M
Q3 24
$683.0M
$606.1M
Q2 24
$711.0M
$592.2M
Net Profit
L
L
PRG
PRG
Q1 26
$36.1M
Q4 25
$402.0M
$40.5M
Q3 25
$504.0M
$33.1M
Q2 25
$391.0M
$38.5M
Q1 25
$370.0M
$34.7M
Q4 24
$187.0M
$57.5M
Q3 24
$401.0M
$84.0M
Q2 24
$369.0M
$33.8M
Operating Margin
L
L
PRG
PRG
Q1 26
10.0%
Q4 25
65.4%
6.9%
Q3 25
94.1%
9.0%
Q2 25
70.1%
10.0%
Q1 25
60.8%
8.2%
Q4 24
23.8%
8.9%
Q3 24
80.5%
8.1%
Q2 24
71.3%
9.4%
Net Margin
L
L
PRG
PRG
Q1 26
5.5%
Q4 25
48.6%
7.7%
Q3 25
68.9%
5.6%
Q2 25
50.8%
6.4%
Q1 25
43.7%
5.1%
Q4 24
23.7%
10.3%
Q3 24
58.7%
13.9%
Q2 24
51.9%
5.7%
EPS (diluted)
L
L
PRG
PRG
Q1 26
$3.68
Q4 25
$1.93
$0.99
Q3 25
$2.43
$0.82
Q2 25
$1.87
$0.95
Q1 25
$1.74
$0.83
Q4 24
$0.87
$1.33
Q3 24
$1.82
$1.94
Q2 24
$1.67
$0.77

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
L
L
PRG
PRG
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$6.0B
$69.4M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$8.4B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$18.7B
$774.4M
Total Assets
$86.3B
$2.0B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.45×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
L
L
PRG
PRG
Q1 26
$69.4M
Q4 25
$6.0B
$308.8M
Q3 25
$5.4B
$292.6M
Q2 25
$4.5B
$222.0M
Q1 25
$4.4B
$213.3M
Q4 24
$4.6B
$90.9M
Q3 24
$5.2B
$221.7M
Q2 24
$4.9B
$250.1M
Total Debt
L
L
PRG
PRG
Q1 26
Q4 25
$8.4B
$594.9M
Q3 25
$8.4B
Q2 25
$7.9B
Q1 25
$8.4B
Q4 24
$8.9B
$643.6M
Q3 24
$8.8B
Q2 24
$8.6B
Stockholders' Equity
L
L
PRG
PRG
Q1 26
$774.4M
Q4 25
$18.7B
$746.4M
Q3 25
$18.3B
$703.6M
Q2 25
$17.5B
$668.7M
Q1 25
$17.2B
$654.4M
Q4 24
$17.1B
$650.3M
Q3 24
$17.4B
$630.8M
Q2 24
$16.4B
$581.9M
Total Assets
L
L
PRG
PRG
Q1 26
$2.0B
Q4 25
$86.3B
$1.6B
Q3 25
$85.9B
$1.5B
Q2 25
$84.7B
$1.5B
Q1 25
$83.1B
$1.5B
Q4 24
$81.9B
$1.5B
Q3 24
$83.6B
$1.4B
Q2 24
$81.1B
$1.5B
Debt / Equity
L
L
PRG
PRG
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.45×
0.80×
Q3 25
0.46×
Q2 25
0.45×
Q1 25
0.49×
Q4 24
0.52×
0.99×
Q3 24
0.51×
Q2 24
0.52×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
L
L
PRG
PRG
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$617.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$426.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
51.5%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
23.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.53×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$2.7B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
L
L
PRG
PRG
Q1 26
Q4 25
$617.0M
$-54.9M
Q3 25
$920.0M
$110.0M
Q2 25
$1.0B
$69.9M
Q1 25
$736.0M
$209.9M
Q4 24
$941.0M
$-84.5M
Q3 24
$934.0M
$31.9M
Q2 24
$952.0M
$55.4M
Free Cash Flow
L
L
PRG
PRG
Q1 26
Q4 25
$426.0M
$-57.5M
Q3 25
$764.0M
$106.5M
Q2 25
$872.0M
$68.0M
Q1 25
$638.0M
$208.0M
Q4 24
$767.0M
$-86.8M
Q3 24
$794.0M
$29.8M
Q2 24
$793.0M
$53.5M
FCF Margin
L
L
PRG
PRG
Q1 26
Q4 25
51.5%
-10.9%
Q3 25
104.4%
17.9%
Q2 25
113.4%
11.2%
Q1 25
75.4%
30.4%
Q4 24
97.2%
-15.5%
Q3 24
116.3%
4.9%
Q2 24
111.5%
9.0%
Capex Intensity
L
L
PRG
PRG
Q1 26
Q4 25
23.1%
0.5%
Q3 25
21.3%
0.6%
Q2 25
17.4%
0.3%
Q1 25
11.6%
0.3%
Q4 24
22.1%
0.4%
Q3 24
20.5%
0.3%
Q2 24
22.4%
0.3%
Cash Conversion
L
L
PRG
PRG
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.53×
-1.36×
Q3 25
1.83×
3.32×
Q2 25
2.57×
1.82×
Q1 25
1.99×
6.05×
Q4 24
5.03×
-1.47×
Q3 24
2.33×
0.38×
Q2 24
2.58×
1.64×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

L
L

Transportation And Storage Of Natural Gas And NG Ls And Ethane Supply And Transportation Services$601.0M73%
Lodging And Related Services$226.0M27%

PRG
PRG

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons