vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Loews Corporation (L) and Atlassian Corp (TEAM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Atlassian Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6B vs $827.0M, roughly 1.9× Loews Corporation). Loews Corporation runs the higher net margin — 48.6% vs -2.7%, a 51.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Atlassian Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.3% vs 4.8%). Loews Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($426.0M vs $168.5M).

Loews Corporation is a diversified US-based conglomerate that operates across multiple key industry segments through its subsidiaries. Its core business lines include property and casualty insurance, natural gas pipeline transportation, hospitality services, and upstream oil and gas exploration and production, primarily serving commercial, consumer and industrial clients across North American markets.

The Dragoneer Investment Group (Dragoneer) is an American investment firm based in San Francisco, California. The firm focuses on technology investments in both public and private markets globally.

L vs TEAM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
TEAM
TEAM
1.9× larger
TEAM
$1.6B
$827.0M
L
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
TEAM
TEAM
+18.5% gap
TEAM
23.3%
4.8%
L
Higher net margin
L
L
51.3% more per $
L
48.6%
-2.7%
TEAM
More free cash flow
L
L
$257.5M more FCF
L
$426.0M
$168.5M
TEAM

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026

Metric
L
L
TEAM
TEAM
Revenue
$827.0M
$1.6B
Net Profit
$402.0M
$-42.6M
Gross Margin
85.0%
Operating Margin
65.4%
-3.0%
Net Margin
48.6%
-2.7%
Revenue YoY
4.8%
23.3%
Net Profit YoY
115.0%
-11.6%
EPS (diluted)
$1.93
$-0.16

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
L
L
TEAM
TEAM
Q4 25
$827.0M
$1.6B
Q3 25
$732.0M
$1.4B
Q2 25
$769.0M
$1.4B
Q1 25
$846.0M
$1.4B
Q4 24
$789.0M
$1.3B
Q3 24
$683.0M
$1.2B
Q2 24
$711.0M
Q1 24
$710.0M
$1.2B
Net Profit
L
L
TEAM
TEAM
Q4 25
$402.0M
$-42.6M
Q3 25
$504.0M
$-51.9M
Q2 25
$391.0M
$-23.9M
Q1 25
$370.0M
$-70.8M
Q4 24
$187.0M
$-38.2M
Q3 24
$401.0M
$-123.8M
Q2 24
$369.0M
Q1 24
$457.0M
$12.8M
Gross Margin
L
L
TEAM
TEAM
Q4 25
85.0%
Q3 25
82.0%
Q2 25
83.1%
Q1 25
83.8%
Q4 24
82.7%
Q3 24
81.7%
Q2 24
Q1 24
82.1%
Operating Margin
L
L
TEAM
TEAM
Q4 25
65.4%
-3.0%
Q3 25
94.1%
-6.7%
Q2 25
70.1%
-2.1%
Q1 25
60.8%
-0.9%
Q4 24
23.8%
-4.5%
Q3 24
80.5%
-2.7%
Q2 24
71.3%
Q1 24
88.6%
1.5%
Net Margin
L
L
TEAM
TEAM
Q4 25
48.6%
-2.7%
Q3 25
68.9%
-3.6%
Q2 25
50.8%
-1.7%
Q1 25
43.7%
-5.2%
Q4 24
23.7%
-3.0%
Q3 24
58.7%
-10.4%
Q2 24
51.9%
Q1 24
64.4%
1.1%
EPS (diluted)
L
L
TEAM
TEAM
Q4 25
$1.93
$-0.16
Q3 25
$2.43
$-0.20
Q2 25
$1.87
$-0.08
Q1 25
$1.74
$-0.27
Q4 24
$0.87
$-0.15
Q3 24
$1.82
$-0.48
Q2 24
$1.67
Q1 24
$2.05
$0.05

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
L
L
TEAM
TEAM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$6.0B
$1.6B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$8.4B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$18.7B
$1.6B
Total Assets
$86.3B
$6.2B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.45×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
L
L
TEAM
TEAM
Q4 25
$6.0B
$1.6B
Q3 25
$5.4B
$2.8B
Q2 25
$4.5B
$2.9B
Q1 25
$4.4B
$3.0B
Q4 24
$4.6B
$2.5B
Q3 24
$5.2B
$2.2B
Q2 24
$4.9B
Q1 24
$5.4B
$2.1B
Total Debt
L
L
TEAM
TEAM
Q4 25
$8.4B
Q3 25
$8.4B
Q2 25
$7.9B
Q1 25
$8.4B
Q4 24
$8.9B
Q3 24
$8.8B
Q2 24
$8.6B
Q1 24
$8.4B
Stockholders' Equity
L
L
TEAM
TEAM
Q4 25
$18.7B
$1.6B
Q3 25
$18.3B
$1.4B
Q2 25
$17.5B
$1.3B
Q1 25
$17.2B
$1.4B
Q4 24
$17.1B
$1.2B
Q3 24
$17.4B
$1.0B
Q2 24
$16.4B
Q1 24
$16.2B
$1.1B
Total Assets
L
L
TEAM
TEAM
Q4 25
$86.3B
$6.2B
Q3 25
$85.9B
$5.7B
Q2 25
$84.7B
$6.0B
Q1 25
$83.1B
$5.9B
Q4 24
$81.9B
$5.4B
Q3 24
$83.6B
$5.0B
Q2 24
$81.1B
Q1 24
$80.9B
$5.1B
Debt / Equity
L
L
TEAM
TEAM
Q4 25
0.45×
Q3 25
0.46×
Q2 25
0.45×
Q1 25
0.49×
Q4 24
0.52×
Q3 24
0.51×
Q2 24
0.52×
Q1 24
0.52×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
L
L
TEAM
TEAM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$617.0M
$177.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$426.0M
$168.5M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
51.5%
10.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
23.1%
0.6%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.53×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$2.7B
$1.3B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
L
L
TEAM
TEAM
Q4 25
$617.0M
$177.8M
Q3 25
$920.0M
$128.7M
Q2 25
$1.0B
$375.3M
Q1 25
$736.0M
$652.7M
Q4 24
$941.0M
$351.9M
Q3 24
$934.0M
$80.5M
Q2 24
$952.0M
Q1 24
$198.0M
$565.4M
Free Cash Flow
L
L
TEAM
TEAM
Q4 25
$426.0M
$168.5M
Q3 25
$764.0M
$114.6M
Q2 25
$872.0M
$360.3M
Q1 25
$638.0M
$638.3M
Q4 24
$767.0M
$342.6M
Q3 24
$794.0M
$74.3M
Q2 24
$793.0M
Q1 24
$39.0M
$554.9M
FCF Margin
L
L
TEAM
TEAM
Q4 25
51.5%
10.6%
Q3 25
104.4%
8.0%
Q2 25
113.4%
26.0%
Q1 25
75.4%
47.0%
Q4 24
97.2%
26.6%
Q3 24
116.3%
6.3%
Q2 24
111.5%
Q1 24
5.5%
46.7%
Capex Intensity
L
L
TEAM
TEAM
Q4 25
23.1%
0.6%
Q3 25
21.3%
1.0%
Q2 25
17.4%
1.1%
Q1 25
11.6%
1.1%
Q4 24
22.1%
0.7%
Q3 24
20.5%
0.5%
Q2 24
22.4%
Q1 24
22.4%
0.9%
Cash Conversion
L
L
TEAM
TEAM
Q4 25
1.53×
Q3 25
1.83×
Q2 25
2.57×
Q1 25
1.99×
Q4 24
5.03×
Q3 24
2.33×
Q2 24
2.58×
Q1 24
0.43×
44.34×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

L
L

Transportation And Storage Of Natural Gas And NG Ls And Ethane Supply And Transportation Services$601.0M73%
Lodging And Related Services$226.0M27%

TEAM
TEAM

Cloud Deployment Services$1.1B67%
Data Center Deployment$435.6M27%
Marketplace And Services Deployment$83.7M5%

Related Comparisons