vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Loews Corporation (L) and Willis Towers Watson (WTW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Willis Towers Watson is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.9B vs $827.0M, roughly 3.5× Loews Corporation). Loews Corporation runs the higher net margin — 48.6% vs 25.5%, a 23.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Loews Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.8% vs -3.5%). Willis Towers Watson produced more free cash flow last quarter ($708.0M vs $426.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Willis Towers Watson's revenue compounded faster (12.0% CAGR vs 7.9%).

Loews Corporation is a diversified US-based conglomerate that operates across multiple key industry segments through its subsidiaries. Its core business lines include property and casualty insurance, natural gas pipeline transportation, hospitality services, and upstream oil and gas exploration and production, primarily serving commercial, consumer and industrial clients across North American markets.

Willis Towers Watson plc is a British-American multinational advisory, broking and solutions company. Its operations span commercial insurance brokerage and risk advisory, employee benefits and rewards consulting, retirement and actuarial services, and investment advice for pension funds and institutional investors.

L vs WTW — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
WTW
WTW
3.5× larger
WTW
$2.9B
$827.0M
L
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
L
L
+8.4% gap
L
4.8%
-3.5%
WTW
Higher net margin
L
L
23.1% more per $
L
48.6%
25.5%
WTW
More free cash flow
WTW
WTW
$282.0M more FCF
WTW
$708.0M
$426.0M
L
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
WTW
WTW
Annualised
WTW
12.0%
7.9%
L

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
L
L
WTW
WTW
Revenue
$827.0M
$2.9B
Net Profit
$402.0M
$735.0M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
65.4%
35.3%
Net Margin
48.6%
25.5%
Revenue YoY
4.8%
-3.5%
Net Profit YoY
115.0%
-41.0%
EPS (diluted)
$1.93
$7.50

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
L
L
WTW
WTW
Q4 25
$827.0M
$2.9B
Q3 25
$732.0M
$2.2B
Q2 25
$769.0M
$2.2B
Q1 25
$846.0M
$2.2B
Q4 24
$789.0M
$3.0B
Q3 24
$683.0M
$2.2B
Q2 24
$711.0M
$2.2B
Q1 24
$710.0M
$2.3B
Net Profit
L
L
WTW
WTW
Q4 25
$402.0M
$735.0M
Q3 25
$504.0M
$304.0M
Q2 25
$391.0M
$331.0M
Q1 25
$370.0M
$235.0M
Q4 24
$187.0M
$1.2B
Q3 24
$401.0M
$-1.7B
Q2 24
$369.0M
$141.0M
Q1 24
$457.0M
$190.0M
Operating Margin
L
L
WTW
WTW
Q4 25
65.4%
35.3%
Q3 25
94.1%
18.7%
Q2 25
70.1%
16.6%
Q1 25
60.8%
19.8%
Q4 24
23.8%
30.2%
Q3 24
80.5%
-34.2%
Q2 24
71.3%
9.6%
Q1 24
88.6%
12.2%
Net Margin
L
L
WTW
WTW
Q4 25
48.6%
25.5%
Q3 25
68.9%
13.6%
Q2 25
50.8%
14.9%
Q1 25
43.7%
10.8%
Q4 24
23.7%
41.7%
Q3 24
58.7%
-74.8%
Q2 24
51.9%
6.4%
Q1 24
64.4%
8.3%
EPS (diluted)
L
L
WTW
WTW
Q4 25
$1.93
$7.50
Q3 25
$2.43
$3.11
Q2 25
$1.87
$3.32
Q1 25
$1.74
$2.33
Q4 24
$0.87
$12.29
Q3 24
$1.82
$-16.44
Q2 24
$1.67
$1.36
Q1 24
$2.05
$1.83

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
L
L
WTW
WTW
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$6.0B
$3.2B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$8.4B
$9.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$18.7B
$8.0B
Total Assets
$86.3B
$29.5B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.45×
1.21×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
L
L
WTW
WTW
Q4 25
$6.0B
$3.2B
Q3 25
$5.4B
$1.9B
Q2 25
$4.5B
$2.0B
Q1 25
$4.4B
$1.5B
Q4 24
$4.6B
$1.9B
Q3 24
$5.2B
$1.4B
Q2 24
$4.9B
$1.2B
Q1 24
$5.4B
$1.9B
Total Debt
L
L
WTW
WTW
Q4 25
$8.4B
$9.7B
Q3 25
$8.4B
Q2 25
$7.9B
Q1 25
$8.4B
Q4 24
$8.9B
$8.6B
Q3 24
$8.8B
Q2 24
$8.6B
Q1 24
$8.4B
Stockholders' Equity
L
L
WTW
WTW
Q4 25
$18.7B
$8.0B
Q3 25
$18.3B
$7.7B
Q2 25
$17.5B
$8.1B
Q1 25
$17.2B
$8.1B
Q4 24
$17.1B
$7.9B
Q3 24
$17.4B
$7.5B
Q2 24
$16.4B
$9.3B
Q1 24
$16.2B
$9.5B
Total Assets
L
L
WTW
WTW
Q4 25
$86.3B
$29.5B
Q3 25
$85.9B
$27.4B
Q2 25
$84.7B
$28.5B
Q1 25
$83.1B
$28.1B
Q4 24
$81.9B
$27.7B
Q3 24
$83.6B
$27.2B
Q2 24
$81.1B
$29.6B
Q1 24
$80.9B
$30.2B
Debt / Equity
L
L
WTW
WTW
Q4 25
0.45×
1.21×
Q3 25
0.46×
Q2 25
0.45×
Q1 25
0.49×
Q4 24
0.52×
1.08×
Q3 24
0.51×
Q2 24
0.52×
Q1 24
0.52×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
L
L
WTW
WTW
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$617.0M
$771.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$426.0M
$708.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
51.5%
24.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
23.1%
2.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.53×
1.05×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$2.7B
$1.5B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
L
L
WTW
WTW
Q4 25
$617.0M
$771.0M
Q3 25
$920.0M
$678.0M
Q2 25
$1.0B
$361.0M
Q1 25
$736.0M
$-35.0M
Q4 24
$941.0M
$599.0M
Q3 24
$934.0M
$482.0M
Q2 24
$952.0M
$407.0M
Q1 24
$198.0M
$24.0M
Free Cash Flow
L
L
WTW
WTW
Q4 25
$426.0M
$708.0M
Q3 25
$764.0M
$621.0M
Q2 25
$872.0M
$303.0M
Q1 25
$638.0M
$-86.0M
Q4 24
$767.0M
$543.0M
Q3 24
$794.0M
$419.0M
Q2 24
$793.0M
$341.0M
Q1 24
$39.0M
$-36.0M
FCF Margin
L
L
WTW
WTW
Q4 25
51.5%
24.6%
Q3 25
104.4%
27.7%
Q2 25
113.4%
13.7%
Q1 25
75.4%
-3.9%
Q4 24
97.2%
18.2%
Q3 24
116.3%
18.7%
Q2 24
111.5%
15.4%
Q1 24
5.5%
-1.6%
Capex Intensity
L
L
WTW
WTW
Q4 25
23.1%
2.2%
Q3 25
21.3%
2.5%
Q2 25
17.4%
2.6%
Q1 25
11.6%
2.3%
Q4 24
22.1%
1.9%
Q3 24
20.5%
2.8%
Q2 24
22.4%
3.0%
Q1 24
22.4%
2.6%
Cash Conversion
L
L
WTW
WTW
Q4 25
1.53×
1.05×
Q3 25
1.83×
2.23×
Q2 25
2.57×
1.09×
Q1 25
1.99×
-0.15×
Q4 24
5.03×
0.48×
Q3 24
2.33×
Q2 24
2.58×
2.89×
Q1 24
0.43×
0.13×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

L
L

Transportation And Storage Of Natural Gas And NG Ls And Ethane Supply And Transportation Services$601.0M73%
Lodging And Related Services$226.0M27%

WTW
WTW

Health Wealth And Career$1.7B58%
GB$566.0M20%
Broking$465.0M16%
Other$113.0M4%
December Thirty One Two Thousand And Twenty Four$67.0M2%
IE$38.0M1%

Related Comparisons