vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of STANDARD BIOTOOLS INC. (LAB) and RGC RESOURCES INC (RGCO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RGC RESOURCES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($30.6M vs $19.6M, roughly 1.6× STANDARD BIOTOOLS INC.). RGC RESOURCES INC runs the higher net margin — 16.0% vs -177.4%, a 193.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RGC RESOURCES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.9% vs -11.5%). RGC RESOURCES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-4.6M vs $-23.1M). Over the past eight quarters, RGC RESOURCES INC's revenue compounded faster (-0.4% CAGR vs -12.2%).
Standard BioTools Inc., previously known as Fluidigm Corp., is an American life science tools company that offers analytical mass cytometry systems for flow cytometry and tissue imaging, along with associated assays and reagents, as well as an automated genomic analysis instrument and a variety of microfluidic arrays, or integrated fluidic circuits (IFCs), and consumables with fully kitted reagents. Custom assays and services are available with all systems and applications.
Iluka Resources is an Australian resources company, specialising in mineral sands exploration, project development, operations and marketing. It was formed in July 1998 in a merger between Westralian Sands and the titanium mineral business RGC Ltd, becoming Iluka Resources Ltd in 1999. Iluka is a major producer of zircon and titanium dioxide–derived rutile and synthetic rutile globally. The company has operations in Australia, and has also conducted business in the United States and the West ...
LAB vs RGCO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $19.6M | $30.6M |
| Net Profit | $-34.7M | $4.9M |
| Gross Margin | 48.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | -168.5% | 21.4% |
| Net Margin | -177.4% | 16.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -11.5% | 13.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -28.8% | -7.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.09 | $0.47 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $30.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.6M | $14.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.8M | $16.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.8M | $36.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $26.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.5M | $13.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.5M | $30.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-34.7M | $-204.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-33.5M | $538.4K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-26.0M | $7.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-26.9M | $140.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-45.7M | $156.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-32.2M | $6.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 48.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 53.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 21.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -168.5% | -3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -118.1% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -80.8% | 28.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -120.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -134.5% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -132.2% | 28.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 16.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -177.4% | -1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -153.7% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -63.8% | 21.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -122.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -203.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -70.6% | 20.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.47 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | $0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | $0.74 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.51 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.07 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | $0.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.27 | $0.63 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $129.4M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $399.7M | $116.4M |
| Total Assets | $539.6M | $341.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $129.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $158.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $150.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $210.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $269.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $287.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $55.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $399.7M | $113.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $424.5M | $116.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $454.6M | $117.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $111.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $489.3M | $108.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $510.3M | $108.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $577.3M | $110.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $341.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $539.6M | $329.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $557.0M | $324.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $579.6M | $326.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $335.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $681.5M | $320.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $708.7M | $314.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $777.7M | $313.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.10× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-22.2M | $1.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-23.1M | $-4.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -118.1% | -14.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.5% | 18.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.22× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-111.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-22.2M | $675.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.7M | $6.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-30.3M | $21.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $827.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-27.9M | $377.4K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-39.0M | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-62.5M | $11.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-23.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-22.6M | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-35.3M | $16.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-30.1M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-41.0M | $564.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-63.3M | $5.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | -14.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -118.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -103.6% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -86.6% | 44.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -18.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -136.4% | -40.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -182.2% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -138.9% | 18.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 18.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | 30.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.4% | 13.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.2% | 43.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 39.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 19.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.96× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 37.36× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LAB
| Consumables | $8.7M | 45% |
| Services And Other Revenue | $5.8M | 29% |
| Instruments | $5.1M | 26% |
RGCO
Segment breakdown not available.
