vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of STANDARD BIOTOOLS INC. (LAB) and Virginia National Bankshares Corp (VABK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
STANDARD BIOTOOLS INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($19.6M vs $15.0M, roughly 1.3× Virginia National Bankshares Corp). Virginia National Bankshares Corp runs the higher net margin — 39.7% vs -177.4%, a 217.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Virginia National Bankshares Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.6% vs -11.5%). Virginia National Bankshares Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($20.8M vs $-23.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Virginia National Bankshares Corp's revenue compounded faster (7.0% CAGR vs -12.2%).
Standard BioTools Inc., previously known as Fluidigm Corp., is an American life science tools company that offers analytical mass cytometry systems for flow cytometry and tissue imaging, along with associated assays and reagents, as well as an automated genomic analysis instrument and a variety of microfluidic arrays, or integrated fluidic circuits (IFCs), and consumables with fully kitted reagents. Custom assays and services are available with all systems and applications.
United Bankshares, Inc. is a bank holding company dual-headquartered in Charleston, West Virginia and Fairfax, Virginia with operations in West Virginia, Virginia, the District of Columbia, Maryland, Ohio, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia in the United States. United Bankshares is the parent company of United Bank which comprises nearly 250 offices in eight states. In addition, UBSI is the parent company to subsidiaries George Mason Mortgage, United Brokerage, and Cre...
LAB vs VABK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $19.6M | $15.0M |
| Net Profit | $-34.7M | $6.0M |
| Gross Margin | 48.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | -168.5% | 50.5% |
| Net Margin | -177.4% | 39.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -11.5% | 3.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -28.8% | 30.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.09 | $1.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $15.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.6M | $14.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.8M | $14.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.8M | $14.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $13.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.5M | $12.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.5M | $13.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-34.7M | $4.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-33.5M | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-26.0M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-26.9M | $4.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-45.7M | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-32.2M | $3.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 48.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 53.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 50.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -168.5% | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -118.1% | 38.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -80.8% | 38.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 40.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -120.9% | 41.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -134.5% | 39.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -132.2% | 32.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 39.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -177.4% | 31.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -153.7% | 30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -63.8% | 31.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 31.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -122.0% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -203.3% | 32.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -70.6% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | $0.84 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | $0.78 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | $0.83 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.85 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.07 | $0.85 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | $0.77 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.27 | $0.68 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $129.4M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $399.7M | $184.2M |
| Total Assets | $539.6M | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $129.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $158.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $150.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $210.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $269.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $287.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $55.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $184.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $399.7M | $177.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $424.5M | $170.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $454.6M | $166.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $160.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $489.3M | $165.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $510.3M | $154.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $577.3M | $152.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $539.6M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $557.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $579.6M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $681.5M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $708.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $777.7M | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.10× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-22.2M | $21.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-23.1M | $20.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -118.1% | 138.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.5% | 3.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.58× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-111.1M | $35.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $21.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-22.2M | $6.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.7M | $6.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-30.3M | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-27.9M | $15.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-39.0M | $-6.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-62.5M | $3.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $20.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-23.1M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-22.6M | $6.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-35.3M | $1.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-30.1M | $15.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-41.0M | $-6.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-63.3M | $3.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 138.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -118.1% | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -103.6% | 47.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -86.6% | 13.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 100.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -136.4% | 111.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -182.2% | -53.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -138.9% | 23.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.2% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.58× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.59× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.35× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.30× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1.54× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.87× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LAB
| Consumables | $8.7M | 45% |
| Services And Other Revenue | $5.8M | 29% |
| Instruments | $5.1M | 26% |
VABK
Segment breakdown not available.
