vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LAMAR ADVERTISING CO (LAMR) and LEGGETT & PLATT INC (LEG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LEGGETT & PLATT INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($938.6M vs $528.0M, roughly 1.8× LAMAR ADVERTISING CO). LAMAR ADVERTISING CO runs the higher net margin — 19.3% vs 2.7%, a 16.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LAMAR ADVERTISING CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.5% vs -11.2%). LAMAR ADVERTISING CO produced more free cash flow last quarter ($152.3M vs $101.9M). Over the past eight quarters, LAMAR ADVERTISING CO's revenue compounded faster (-3.4% CAGR vs -7.5%).
Lamar Advertising Company is an advertising company which operates billboards, logo signs, and transit displays in the United States and Canada. The company was founded in 1902 by Charles W. Lamar and J.M. Coe, and is headquartered in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. The company has over 200 locations in the United States and Canada. They have reportedly more than 363,000 displays across the USA. Lamar Advertising Company became a real estate investment trust in 2014.
LEGGETT & PLATT INCLEGEarnings & Financial Report
Leggett & Platt (L&P), based in Carthage, Missouri, is an American diversified manufacturer that designs and produces various engineered components and products that can be found in homes and automobiles. The firm was founded in 1883, and consists of 15 business units, 20,000 employee-partners, and 135 manufacturing facilities located in 18 countries.
LAMR vs LEG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $528.0M | $938.6M |
| Net Profit | $101.8M | $25.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 17.9% |
| Operating Margin | 27.7% | 2.0% |
| Net Margin | 19.3% | 2.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.5% | -11.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -26.9% | 76.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.00 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $528.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $595.9M | $938.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $585.5M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $579.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $505.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $579.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $564.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $565.3M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $101.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $152.3M | $25.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $141.8M | $127.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $154.4M | $52.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.8M | $30.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.2M | $14.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $147.5M | $44.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $137.4M | $-602.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 67.7% | 17.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 67.9% | 18.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 67.8% | 18.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 64.4% | 18.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 67.8% | 16.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 67.6% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 67.6% | 16.5% |
| Q1 26 | 27.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.3% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.1% | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.8% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.3% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.1% | 5.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.6% | -56.2% |
| Q1 26 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.6% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.2% | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.6% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.5% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.2% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.1% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.3% | -53.4% |
| Q1 26 | $1.00 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.50 | $0.18 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.40 | $0.91 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.52 | $0.38 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.35 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.02 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.44 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.34 | $-4.39 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $39.3M | $587.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $981.7M | $1.0B |
| Total Assets | $6.9B | $3.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.46× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $39.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $64.8M | $587.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.0M | $460.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.7M | $368.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.1M | $412.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.5M | $350.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.5M | $277.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $77.9M | $307.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | $981.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $971.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $906.9M | $855.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $746.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $689.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $741.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $667.6M |
| Q1 26 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.9B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.8B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.7B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6B | $3.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.54× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.55× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $121.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $152.3M | $101.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 28.9% | 10.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.3% | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.84× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $737.7M | $281.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $271.2M | $121.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $235.7M | $125.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $229.5M | $84.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $127.7M | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $279.3M | $122.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $227.4M | $95.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $256.3M | $94.0M |
| Q1 26 | $152.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $208.3M | $101.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $185.8M | $110.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $191.3M | $75.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.9M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $236.3M | $100.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $197.3M | $77.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $233.7M | $78.5M |
| Q1 26 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.0% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.7% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.0% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.4% | -0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 40.8% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.0% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.3% | 7.0% |
| Q1 26 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.5% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.6% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.4% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 1.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.78× | 4.84× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.66× | 0.99× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.49× | 1.60× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.92× | 0.22× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.54× | 2.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.87× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LAMR
Segment breakdown not available.
LEG
| Bedding Products | $373.8M | 40% |
| Flooring And Textile Products Group | $196.9M | 21% |
| Automotive Group | $194.9M | 21% |
| Work Furniture Group | $66.2M | 7% |
| Home Furniture Group | $61.0M | 6% |
| Hydraulic Cylinders | $45.8M | 5% |
