vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of GLADSTONE LAND Corp (LAND) and Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. (PAVS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

GLADSTONE LAND Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($16.6M vs $12.4M, roughly 1.3× Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd.). On growth, Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18033.4% vs -1.5%).

Hongkong Land (HKL) is a property investment, management and development group with commercial and residential property interests across Asia. It owns and manages some 850,000 sq. m. of office and retail property in Asia, principally in Hong Kong and Singapore. Its Hong Kong portfolio represents some 450,000 sq. m. of commercial property, making it the single largest landlord in Central, Hong Kong. In Singapore it has 165,000 sq. m. of office space mainly held through joint ventures. While it...

LAND vs PAVS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
LAND
LAND
1.3× larger
LAND
$16.6M
$12.4M
PAVS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
PAVS
PAVS
+18034.9% gap
PAVS
18033.4%
-1.5%
LAND

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026

Metric
LAND
LAND
PAVS
PAVS
Revenue
$16.6M
$12.4M
Net Profit
$-681.0K
Gross Margin
20.0%
Operating Margin
200.3%
-5.1%
Net Margin
-5.5%
Revenue YoY
-1.5%
18033.4%
Net Profit YoY
61.4%
EPS (diluted)

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
LAND
LAND
PAVS
PAVS
Q1 26
$16.6M
Q4 25
$41.5M
Q3 25
$17.8M
$12.4M
Q2 25
$12.3M
Q1 25
$16.8M
Q4 24
$21.1M
Q3 24
$22.6M
Q2 24
$21.3M
Net Profit
LAND
LAND
PAVS
PAVS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$4.2M
Q3 25
$2.1M
$-681.0K
Q2 25
$-7.9M
Q1 25
$15.1M
Q4 24
$540.0K
Q3 24
$6.0K
Q2 24
$-823.0K
Gross Margin
LAND
LAND
PAVS
PAVS
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
20.0%
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Operating Margin
LAND
LAND
PAVS
PAVS
Q1 26
200.3%
Q4 25
Q3 25
-5.1%
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Net Margin
LAND
LAND
PAVS
PAVS
Q1 26
Q4 25
10.2%
Q3 25
11.7%
-5.5%
Q2 25
-64.1%
Q1 25
89.9%
Q4 24
2.6%
Q3 24
0.0%
Q2 24
-3.9%
EPS (diluted)
LAND
LAND
PAVS
PAVS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-0.05
Q3 25
$-0.11
Q2 25
$-0.38
Q1 25
$0.25
Q4 24
$-0.15
Q3 24
$-0.16
Q2 24
$-0.19

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
LAND
LAND
PAVS
PAVS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$5.2M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$688.3M
$23.6M
Total Assets
$1.2B
$37.3M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
LAND
LAND
PAVS
PAVS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$27.2M
Q3 25
$11.3M
$5.2M
Q2 25
$30.5M
Q1 25
$42.9M
Q4 24
$18.3M
Q3 24
$13.2M
Q2 24
$49.8M
Total Debt
LAND
LAND
PAVS
PAVS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$473.6M
Q3 25
$480.4M
Q2 25
$496.4M
Q1 25
$498.8M
Q4 24
$527.5M
Q3 24
$530.7M
Q2 24
$549.4M
Stockholders' Equity
LAND
LAND
PAVS
PAVS
Q1 26
$688.3M
Q4 25
$670.3M
Q3 25
$661.8M
$23.6M
Q2 25
$670.1M
Q1 25
$689.9M
Q4 24
$687.2M
Q3 24
$691.2M
Q2 24
$708.5M
Total Assets
LAND
LAND
PAVS
PAVS
Q1 26
$1.2B
Q4 25
$1.2B
Q3 25
$1.2B
$37.3M
Q2 25
$1.3B
Q1 25
$1.3B
Q4 24
$1.3B
Q3 24
$1.3B
Q2 24
$1.4B
Debt / Equity
LAND
LAND
PAVS
PAVS
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.71×
Q3 25
0.73×
Q2 25
0.74×
Q1 25
0.72×
Q4 24
0.77×
Q3 24
0.77×
Q2 24
0.78×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
LAND
LAND
PAVS
PAVS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-159.3K
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
LAND
LAND
PAVS
PAVS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$7.0M
Q3 25
$-12.0M
$-159.3K
Q2 25
$3.9M
Q1 25
$4.5M
Q4 24
$29.5M
Q3 24
$-1.4M
Q2 24
$15.9M
Cash Conversion
LAND
LAND
PAVS
PAVS
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.66×
Q3 25
-5.77×
Q2 25
Q1 25
0.30×
Q4 24
54.72×
Q3 24
-227.83×
Q2 24

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons