vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd (LANV) and Live Oak Bancshares, Inc. (LOB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Live Oak Bancshares, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($145.5M vs $144.1M, roughly 1.0× Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd).
Lanvin is a French luxury fashion house founded in 1889 by Jeanne Lanvin in Paris. It is the oldest French fashion house still in operation. Since 2018, it has been a subsidiary of Shanghai-based Lanvin Group. Lanvin Group includes Lanvin, Sergio Rossi, Wolford, St. John Knits, and Caruso.
Live Oak Bank, a subsidiary of Live Oak Bancshares, Inc., is an American bank. Headquartered in Wilmington, North Carolina, it serves small business owners in all 50 states and was the leading SBA 7(a) lender by dollar volume in 2022.
LANV vs LOB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $144.1M | $145.5M |
| Net Profit | — | $27.9M |
| Gross Margin | 53.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -60.5% | — |
| Net Margin | — | 19.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 18.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 187.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.60 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $145.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $161.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $146.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $144.1M | $143.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $126.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $116.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $129.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.7M | $125.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $27.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $46.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $26.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $23.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $13.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $27.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 38.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -60.5% | 21.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -35.0% | 28.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 19.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 28.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.60 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.96 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.55 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.51 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.59 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $32.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $290.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-116.4M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $632.1M | $15.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $290.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $136.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-116.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $999.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.1M | $961.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $15.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $15.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $14.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $632.1M | $13.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $731.8M | $11.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.36× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-75.1K | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $158.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $62.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-75.1K | $49.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-33.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $156.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $47.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-36.2K | $29.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $143.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $60.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $47.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-35.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $107.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $41.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 88.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -28.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 91.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 9.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 42.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.39× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.84× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
