vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd (LANV) and MakeMyTrip Ltd (MMYT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($144.1M vs $88.6M, roughly 1.6× MakeMyTrip Ltd).
Lanvin is a French luxury fashion house founded in 1889 by Jeanne Lanvin in Paris. It is the oldest French fashion house still in operation. Since 2018, it has been a subsidiary of Shanghai-based Lanvin Group. Lanvin Group includes Lanvin, Sergio Rossi, Wolford, St. John Knits, and Caruso.
MakeMyTrip Limited is an Indian online travel company, headquartered in Gurgaon. Founded in 2000, it operates an online travel-booking platform for travel services such as airline tickets, hotel reservations, holiday packages, and rail and bus tickets. The company also maintains offices outside India, including locations in New York, Singapore, Kuala Lumpur, Phuket, Bangkok, Dubai and Istanbul.
LANV vs MMYT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2022
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $144.1M | $88.6M |
| Net Profit | — | — |
| Gross Margin | 53.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -60.5% | 3.8% |
| Net Margin | — | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | 11.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | $144.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.7M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $231.7M | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | $88.6M | ||
| Q4 21 | — | $115.0M | ||
| Q3 21 | — | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 21 | — | $32.8M |
| Q2 25 | 53.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.5% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 58.5% | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — | ||
| Q4 21 | — | — | ||
| Q3 21 | — | — | ||
| Q2 21 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | -60.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -35.0% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -32.5% | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 21 | — | -5.4% | ||
| Q3 21 | — | -11.8% | ||
| Q2 21 | — | -59.4% |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $32.1M | $213.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $290.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-116.4M | $896.5M |
| Total Assets | $632.1M | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $32.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.3M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | $213.3M | ||
| Q4 21 | — | — | ||
| Q3 21 | — | — | ||
| Q2 21 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | $290.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $136.4M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — | ||
| Q4 21 | — | — | ||
| Q3 21 | — | — | ||
| Q2 21 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | $-116.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.1M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | $896.5M | ||
| Q4 21 | — | — | ||
| Q3 21 | — | — | ||
| Q2 21 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | $632.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $731.8M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 21 | — | — | ||
| Q3 21 | — | — | ||
| Q2 21 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — | ||
| Q4 21 | — | — | ||
| Q3 21 | — | — | ||
| Q2 21 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-75.1K | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $-75.1K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-36.2K | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-62.8K | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — | ||
| Q4 21 | — | — | ||
| Q3 21 | — | — | ||
| Q2 21 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
