vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd (LANV) and NICOLET BANKSHARES INC (NIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($144.1M vs $104.0M, roughly 1.4× NICOLET BANKSHARES INC).
Lanvin is a French luxury fashion house founded in 1889 by Jeanne Lanvin in Paris. It is the oldest French fashion house still in operation. Since 2018, it has been a subsidiary of Shanghai-based Lanvin Group. Lanvin Group includes Lanvin, Sergio Rossi, Wolford, St. John Knits, and Caruso.
Nicolet Bankshares, Inc. is a U.S. regional bank holding company based in Green Bay, Wisconsin. They are the parent company of Nicolet National Bank, the second largest Wisconsin-based bank.
LANV vs NIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $144.1M | $104.0M |
| Net Profit | — | $40.3M |
| Gross Margin | 53.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -60.5% | 48.3% |
| Net Margin | — | 38.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 12.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 16.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $2.63 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $104.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $102.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $144.1M | $95.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $89.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $92.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $90.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.7M | $85.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $82.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $40.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $41.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $34.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $32.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $29.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $27.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 48.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 50.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -60.5% | 46.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 44.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 46.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -35.0% | 43.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 41.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 38.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 40.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 37.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 35.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 33.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.63 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.34 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.92 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.82 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $32.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $290.3M | $134.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-116.4M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $632.1M | $9.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.11× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $134.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $134.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $290.3M | $134.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $156.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $161.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $161.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $136.4M | $162.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $162.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-116.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | $9.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $632.1M | $8.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $731.8M | $8.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $8.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.36× | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.15× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-75.1K | $153.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $149.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 143.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.81× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $275.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $153.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $45.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-75.1K | $38.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $41.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $133.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $39.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-36.2K | $37.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $23.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $149.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $45.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $38.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $41.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $116.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $34.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $34.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $20.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 143.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 44.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 40.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 46.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 126.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 24.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 18.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.81× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.08× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.22× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.84× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
