vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd (LANV) and UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ (OLED). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($144.1M vs $142.2M, roughly 1.0× UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\).
Lanvin is a French luxury fashion house founded in 1889 by Jeanne Lanvin in Paris. It is the oldest French fashion house still in operation. Since 2018, it has been a subsidiary of Shanghai-based Lanvin Group. Lanvin Group includes Lanvin, Sergio Rossi, Wolford, St. John Knits, and Caruso.
Universal Display Corporation is a developer and manufacturer of organic light emitting diode (OLED) technologies and materials, and it is a provider of services to the display and lighting industries.
LANV vs OLED — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $144.1M | $142.2M |
| Net Profit | — | $35.9M |
| Gross Margin | 53.9% | 74.6% |
| Operating Margin | -60.5% | 30.1% |
| Net Margin | — | 25.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -14.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -44.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.76 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $142.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $172.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $139.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $144.1M | $171.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $166.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $162.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $161.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.7M | $158.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $35.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $66.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $44.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $67.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $64.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $46.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $66.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $52.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 74.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 76.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 74.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.9% | 77.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 77.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 77.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 77.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.5% | 75.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 38.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 30.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -60.5% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 41.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -35.0% | 35.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 25.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 31.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 38.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 41.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.76 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.40 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.96 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $32.1M | $516.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $290.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-116.4M | — |
| Total Assets | $632.1M | $1.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $516.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $602.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $603.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.1M | $525.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $571.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $492.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $551.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.3M | $530.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $290.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $136.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-116.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.1M | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $632.1M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $731.8M | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.36× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-75.1K | $108.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $108.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $97.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-75.1K | $51.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $30.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $34.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $79.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-36.2K | $67.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $15.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $37.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $22.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $66.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $57.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 60.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 36.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.03× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.28× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LANV
Segment breakdown not available.
OLED
| Material sales | $83.7M | 59% |
| Royalty and license fees | $54.2M | 38% |
| Contract research services | $4.3M | 3% |
