vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd (LANV) and SITIME Corp (SITM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($144.1M vs $113.6M, roughly 1.3× SITIME Corp).
Lanvin is a French luxury fashion house founded in 1889 by Jeanne Lanvin in Paris. It is the oldest French fashion house still in operation. Since 2018, it has been a subsidiary of Shanghai-based Lanvin Group. Lanvin Group includes Lanvin, Sergio Rossi, Wolford, St. John Knits, and Caruso.
SiTime Corporation is a publicly traded fabless chipmaker based in Santa Clara, California that develops micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS), used for timing devices in electronics.
LANV vs SITM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $144.1M | $113.6M |
| Net Profit | — | — |
| Gross Margin | 53.9% | 59.0% |
| Operating Margin | -60.5% | 30.2% |
| Net Margin | — | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | 88.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.20 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $113.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $113.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $144.1M | $69.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $60.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $68.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $57.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.7M | $43.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-20.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-23.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-18.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-19.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-26.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 59.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 56.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 53.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.9% | 51.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 50.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 52.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 51.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.5% | 49.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -19.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -60.5% | -35.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -46.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -43.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -35.0% | -73.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -29.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -39.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -33.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -61.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.20 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.44 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.84 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.83 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.16 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $32.1M | $498.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $290.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-116.4M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $632.1M | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $498.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $290.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $136.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-116.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $692.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $699.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $696.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.1M | $692.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $632.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $872.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $885.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $877.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $731.8M | $878.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.36× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-75.1K | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $25.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $31.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-75.1K | $15.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-36.2K | $-181.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $13.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $26.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-6.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 31.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -6.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 26.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
