vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LANDMARK BANCORP INC (LARK) and R F INDUSTRIES LTD (RFIL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
R F INDUSTRIES LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($22.7M vs $18.8M, roughly 1.2× LANDMARK BANCORP INC). LANDMARK BANCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 27.0% vs 0.8%, a 26.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, R F INDUSTRIES LTD posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (22.9% vs 14.0%). Over the past eight quarters, R F INDUSTRIES LTD's revenue compounded faster (29.8% CAGR vs 13.1%).
Landmark Bancorp Inc is a U.S.-based bank holding company operating Landmark National Bank, primarily serving communities across Kansas. It provides a full range of personal and commercial banking services including deposit accounts, residential mortgages, commercial loans, and wealth management solutions, catering to individual consumers, small businesses and local mid-sized enterprises.
Tootsie Roll Industries is an American manufacturer of confectionery based in Chicago, Illinois. Its best-known products include the namesake Tootsie Rolls and Tootsie Pops. Tootsie Roll Industries currently markets its brands internationally in Canada, Mexico, and over 75 other countries.
LARK vs RFIL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.8M | $22.7M |
| Net Profit | $5.1M | $173.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 36.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | 4.0% |
| Net Margin | 27.0% | 0.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.0% | 22.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.8% | 172.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $18.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.7M | $22.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.2M | $19.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3M | $18.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5M | $19.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.8M | $18.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.9M | $16.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.7M | $16.1M |
| Q1 26 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.7M | $173.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.9M | $392.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4M | $-245.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7M | $-245.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | $-238.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9M | $-705.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0M | $-4.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 36.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 31.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 29.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.7% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.4% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | -2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.5% | -2.6% |
| Q1 26 | 27.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.1% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.1% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.4% | -1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.5% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.5% | -1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.8% | -4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.5% | -26.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.66 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.85 | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.47 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.68 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.52 | $-0.41 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.9M | $5.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $35.2M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $73.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $31.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $839.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $160.6M | $35.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $155.7M | $34.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $148.4M | $34.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.7M | $34.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $136.2M | $34.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.7M | $34.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $128.3M | $34.6M |
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $73.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $73.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $72.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $70.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $71.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $71.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $72.8M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $2.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $2.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 9.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 12.13× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $4.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.6M | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.3M | $-311.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $439.0K | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0M | $601.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.2M | $-244.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4M | $197.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.0M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | $-419.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $354.0K | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0M | $574.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $-418.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.8M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8M | $28.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 112.5% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.4% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.4% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.6% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.3% | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.6% | 0.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 1.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.56× | 12.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.09× | -0.79× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.10× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.71× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.34× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.45× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LARK
Segment breakdown not available.
RFIL
| US | $20.9M | 92% |
| Non Us | $1.8M | 8% |
