vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LANDMARK BANCORP INC (LARK) and Rumble Inc. (RUM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Rumble Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($27.1M vs $18.8M, roughly 1.4× LANDMARK BANCORP INC). LANDMARK BANCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 27.0% vs -120.8%, a 147.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LANDMARK BANCORP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs -10.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Rumble Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (15.2% CAGR vs 13.1%).
Landmark Bancorp Inc is a U.S.-based bank holding company operating Landmark National Bank, primarily serving communities across Kansas. It provides a full range of personal and commercial banking services including deposit accounts, residential mortgages, commercial loans, and wealth management solutions, catering to individual consumers, small businesses and local mid-sized enterprises.
Rumble is a Canadian-American online video platform, web hosting, and cloud services business headquartered in Toronto, Canada, with its U.S. headquarters in Longboat Key, Florida. It was founded in 2013 by Chris Pavlovski, a Canadian technology entrepreneur. Rumble's cloud services business hosts Truth Social, and the video platform is popular among American conservative and far-right users. Rumble has been described as "alt-tech".
LARK vs RUM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.8M | $27.1M |
| Net Profit | $5.1M | $-32.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 5.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | -131.1% |
| Net Margin | 27.0% | -120.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.0% | -10.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.8% | 86.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $18.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.7M | $27.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.2M | $24.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5M | $23.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.8M | $30.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.9M | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.7M | $22.5M |
| Q1 26 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.7M | $-32.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.9M | $-16.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | $-236.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9M | $-31.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0M | $-26.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -14.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -45.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -58.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.7% | -131.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.4% | -113.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.7% | -153.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.2% | -80.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | -131.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.5% | -172.7% |
| Q1 26 | 27.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.1% | -120.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.1% | -65.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.5% | -11.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.5% | -783.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.8% | -125.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.5% | -119.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.66 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.85 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.47 | $-1.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.68 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.52 | $-0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.9M | $237.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $274.8M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $336.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $31.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $237.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $269.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $301.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $114.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $132.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $154.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $160.6M | $274.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $155.7M | $302.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $148.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.7M | $339.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $136.2M | $-63.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.7M | $166.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $128.3M | $192.7M |
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $336.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $367.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $391.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $195.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $217.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $243.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-29.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-31.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -117.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 8.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-70.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.6M | $-29.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.3M | $-10.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $439.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0M | $-14.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.2M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1M | $-19.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4M | $-21.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.0M | $-31.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | $-12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $354.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0M | $-14.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.8M | $-19.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8M | $-23.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 112.5% | -117.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.4% | -48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.4% | -61.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.6% | -40.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.3% | -79.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.6% | -102.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 6.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.56× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.09× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.10× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.71× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.34× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.45× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LARK
Segment breakdown not available.
RUM
| Audience Monetization | $23.8M | 88% |
| Other Initiatives | $3.3M | 12% |
